Abstract

Glyphosate is the most commonly used herbicide worldwide. Its improper use during recent decades has resulted in glyphosate contamination of soils and waters. Fungal bioremediation is an environmentally friendly, cost effective, and feasible solution to glyphosate contamination in soils. In this study, several saprotrophic fungi isolated from agricultural environments were screened for their ability to tolerate and utilise Roundup in different cultural conditions as a nutritional source. Purpureocillium lilacinum was further screened to evaluate the ability to break down and utilise glyphosate as a P source in a liquid medium. The dose–response effect for Roundup, and the difference in toxicity between pure glyphosate and Roundup were also studied. This study reports the ability of several strains to tolerate 1 mM and 10 mM Roundup and to utilise it as nutritional source. P. lilacinum was reported for the first time for its ability to degrade glyphosate to a considerable extent (80%) and to utilise it as a P source, without showing dose-dependent negative effects on growth. Pure glyphosate was found to be more toxic than Roundup for P. lilacinum. Our results showed that pure glyphosate toxicity can be only partially addressed by the pH decrease determined in the culture medium. In conclusion, our study emphasises the noteworthy potential of P. lilacinum in glyphosate degradation.

Highlights

  • Since the beginning of the Green Revolution, agriculture heavily relied on agrochemicals such as herbicides, pesticides, and chemical fertilisers to support high levels of food production to meet the demand [1]

  • A. alliaceus Fungal Biodiversity Laboratory (FBL) 483 did not show the differences between the control and treatments at any tested concentrations

  • A. flavipes FBL 427 and P. lilacinum FBL 478 showed no differences between 1 mM RU and 10 mM RU but showed significant differences between control and 10mM RU

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the beginning of the Green Revolution, agriculture heavily relied on agrochemicals such as herbicides, pesticides, and chemical fertilisers to support high levels of food production to meet the demand [1]. The presence of agrochemical residues in the environment and in processed food have raised concerns for their toxic effects on non-target organisms, including humans [3,4,5]. These concerns led to the enactment of legislation requiring the limitation of agrochemical use 335 2009/128/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council). This recently developed awareness concerns in particular glyphosate, known as N-(phosphonomethyl)-glycine. Being the active substance in more than 700 available commercial products [6,7,8], it is one of the most applied agrochemicals and undoubtedly the most commonly used herbicide worldwide, with an expected use of 740 to 920 thousand

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call