Abstract

espanolRESUMEN: El proposito de este estudio fue establecer la existencia de alguna diferencia en el contenido de GAG entre las superficies articulares que soportan y no soportan peso, comparando articulaciones metacarpofalangicas equinas macroscopicamente sanas y danadas. Las muestras de cartilago se obtuvieron desde la superficie de apoyo de articulaciones macroscopicamente sanas (N1; n=10) y de aquellas macroscopicamente danadas (P1; n=10). Adicionalmente, en una localizacion dorsoproximal se obtuvieron muestras de la superficie del cartilago sin apoyo, desde articulaciones sanas (N2; n=10) y danadas (P2; n=10). Los GAG fueron extraidos desde 100 mg de cartilago de cada muestra y cuantificados mediante el metodo safranina-O que mide la carga anionica total y por el metodo del carbazol que mide el contenido de acido uronico. Ambos metodos fueron capaces de medir el contenido de GAG no encontrandose diferencias entre zonas intraarticulacion (1 y 2). Al comparar el contenido de GAG entre articulaciones sanas y danadas, ambos metodos evidenciaron una disminucion significativa de GAG en las articulaciones danadas (1 y 2). Estos resultados muestran que en un proceso patologico articular cronico se afecta el cartilago en su conjunto y no solo aquellas zonas que muestran lesiones macroscopicas al soportar mayor impacto mecanico. EnglishABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to establish if there was any difference in the GAGs content between loaded and unloaded surfaces of the joint. Furthermore, the results were compared between macroscopically healthy and damaged joints. Cartilage samples were obtained from two different zones of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint (metacarpal condyles). Samples were collected from the loaded surface of macroscopically healthy joints (N1; n=10) and from macroscopically damaged cartilage (P1; n=10). Additionally, cartilage samples were collected from unloaded areas at the most dorso-proximal zone of the joint in macroscopically healthy joints (N2; n=10) and from the macroscopically pathological joints but without damaged cartilage on the site of sampling (P2; n=10). The GAGs were extracted from 100 mg of cartilage of each sample and quantified through the safranine - O method that measured the total anionic charges, and through the carbazole method that measured the uronic acid content. Both methods measured the GAGs content, showing no differences between intra-joint zones (1 and 2), but when the GAGs content was compared between healthy and pathological joints, both methods showed a significantly decreased GAGs content in the damaged joints (1 and 2). These results show that the whole articular cartilage could be affected in a chronic pathological process and is not only a local process occurring in the macroscopically damaged cartilage associated with the loaded area.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call