Abstract
Enterococci are an important cause of nosocomial and community-acquired infections, with bacteraemia being one of the most common presentations. Although inappropriate antimicrobial therapy has been associated with poorer outcomes in Enterococcus faecalis (EF) bacteraemia, the impact of antimicrobial choice, namely β-lactam versus glycopeptide therapy, has not been well described. We sought to determine whether choice of antibiotic affects patient outcomes in EF bacteraemia. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Liverpool and Bankstown Lidcombe Hospitals, Sydney, Australia between 2006 and 2013. Medical records and laboratory data for consecutive EF bacteraemias were reviewed. Clinical and microbiological data were obtained for all patients who received appropriate antimicrobial therapy with either a β-lactam or a glycopeptide antibiotic. Outcomes and predictors of mortality were determined and treatment groups were compared. One hundred and seventy-two episodes of clinically significant EF bacteraemias received appropriate antimicrobial therapy with a β-lactam (n = 126) or a glycopeptide (n = 46). All-cause 30 day mortality was 15.1%, with mortality significantly higher in patients receiving glycopeptide therapy compared with β-lactam therapy (26.1% versus 11.1%, P = 0.015). Glycopeptide therapy remained an independent predictor of 30 day mortality [OR 2.46 (95% CI 1.01-6.02), P = 0.048]. APACHE II score [OR 1.10 (95% CI 1.02-1.18), P = 0.011] and malignancy [OR 2.58 (95% CI 1.03-6.49), P = 0.044] were also independent predictors of 30 day mortality. Glycopeptide use is associated with increased mortality in patients with EF bacteraemia. In the treatment of β-lactam-susceptible EF bacteraemia, β-lactams should be considered first-line therapy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.