Abstract
The present paper sought to test the hypothesis that inhibitory glycine receptors (GlyRs) on giant neurons of the caudal pontine reticular formation (PnC) are involved in the inhibition of the acoustic startle response (ASR) in rats. First we provided evidence for the presence of the strychnine-sensitive inhibitory GlyR on PnC neurons by immunocytochemical labeling using an antibody against the α 1 subunit of the GlyR. We then measured the ASR as well as two ASR inhibiting phenomena, short-term habituation and prepulse inhibition, after microinjections of the glycine antagonist strychnine (0, 5 or 10 nmol) or the glycine agonist β-alanine (0, 50 or 100 nmol) into the PnC. Neither strychnine nor β-alanine had a measurable influence on any of the parameters of the ASR investigated (amplitude, short-term habituation, prepulse inhibition). In contrast, systemic injection of strychnine (1 mg/kg) markedly increased the ASR amplitude. The systemic administration of strychnine did not impair prepulse inhibition. The human ‘startle disease’ (hyperekplexia), an exaggerated startle response, is caused by a defect of the α 1 subunit of the inhibitory GlyR, but it is unclear at which site in the central nervous system this defect ultimately leads to the symptoms of hyperekplexia. Our data indicate that a blockade of the inhibitory GlyRs in the PnC does not affect the ASR of rats, suggesting that deficient GlyRs in the PnC might not be involved in the etiology of the human ‘startle disease’. We conclude that the inhibitory GlyRs on PnC neurons are not necessary for the inhibition of the ASR and believe that they are involved in another behavioral context.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.