Glycemic status during pregnancy according to fasting and post-load glucose values: The association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. An observational study

Abstract

AimPrognosis of treated hyperglycemia in pregnancy (HIP) may differ according to whether diagnosis following an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is based on high fasting and/or high post-load glucose values. MethodsFrom a multiethnic prospective study, we included 8,339 women screened for HIP after 22 weeks of gestation. We evaluated the risk of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infant (primary endpoint) and other adverse pregnancy outcomes according to HIP status in four groups defined as follows: no HIP (n = 6,832, reference); isolated fasting HIP (n = 465), isolated post-load HIP (n = 646), and fasting and post-load HIP (n = 396). ResultsAfter adjusting for age, body mass index, ethnicity, smoking during pregnancy and parity, compared with no HIP, the adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for LGA infant were higher in the isolated fasting HIP (1.47 [1.11–1.96]) and fasting and post-load HIP (1.65 [1.23–2.21]) groups, but not in the isolated post-load HIP (1.13 [0.86–1.48]) group. The adjusted odds ratios for preterm delivery and neonatal intensive care unit were higher in the post-load HIP group (1.44 [1.03–2.03] and 1.28 [1.04–1.57], respectively), the fasting and post-load HIP group (1.81 [1.23–2.68] and 1.42 [1.10–1.81], respectively) but not in the isolated fasting HIP group (1.34 [0.90–2.00] and 1.20 [0.94–1.52], respectively). ConclusionDespite glucose-lowering care and adjustment for confounders, compared with no HIP, fasting HIP was associated with a higher rate of LGA infant, whereas post-load HIP was associated with higher preterm delivery and neonatal intensive care unit admission rates.