Abstract

This study characterizes glutathione (GSH)S-transferase (GST) isoenzymes of the liver and forestomach of the female A/J mouse and compares their specificities in catalyzing the conjugation of GSH with 7β,8α-dihydroxy-9α,10α-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a] pyrene (anti-BPDE), the ultimate carcinogenic metabolite of benzo[a]pyrene (BP). The GST activity in female A/J mouse liver was expressed by a minimum of seven isoenzymes which arose from different homo- or heterodimeric combinations of at least two α class (designated as α1 and α4), four μ class (μ1 to μ4), and one π class GST subunit. The GST isoenzyme composition of A/J mouse forestomach appeared to be different from that of the liver. For example, while GST isoenzymes containing μ3 and μ4 type subunits were selectively expressed in the liver, an α class heterodimeric GST isoenzyme (containing α2 and α3 subunits) was expressed in the forestomach but could not be detected in the liver. The (+)-anti-BPDE appeared to be a better substrate than the (−)-enantiomer for all GSTs, except for isoenzymes containing the α4 type GST subunit. The murine π class GST isoenzyme displayed relativey higher specific activity toward (+)-anti-BPDE compared to other GSTs. The specific activities of mouse GSTs toward (+)-anti-BPDE were in the order of π > μ > α. These results suggest that the π class GST isoenzyme may play an important role in providing protection against BP-induced cancer. Therefore, it seems logical to postulate that the ability of a chemoprotector to increase the expression of GST π may be an important determinant of its effectiveness against BP-induced cancer. To test the validity of this contention, we have determined the effects on hepatic and forestomach GST isoenzyme/subunit expression of three naturally occurring organosulfides (OSCs) from garlic, which significantly differ in their effectiveness against BP-induced forestomach cancer. Treatment of mice with diallyl sulfide (DAS) and diallyl trisulfide (DATS), which are potent inhibitors of BP-induced fore- stomach cancer in mice, resulted in a significant increase in hepatic and forestomach GST activity towardanti-BPDE. On the contrary, this activity was not increased in either organ by dipropyl sulfide (DPS), which is ineffective against BP-induced forestomach cancer. The chemopreventive efficacy of these OSCs correlated with their ability to increase the expression of GST π. For example, DAS treatment resulted in approximate increases of 1.7- and 2.2-fold in hepatic and forestomach GST π expression, respectively, over the control. Treatment of mice with DATS, which is a relatively more potent inhibitor of BP-induced forestomach cancer than DAS, resulted in about 3.8- and 3.2-fold increases, respectively, in hepatic and forestomach GST π expression over the control. On the contrary, the expression of hepatic and forestomach GST π was increased only marginally (10–20%) upon DPS administration. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that induction of GST π can be used as a bioassay for screening potential inhibitors of BP-induced cancer.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call