Abstract

One candidate for the cytosolic labile iron pool is iron(II)glutathione. There is also a widely held opinion that an equivalent cytosolic labile heme pool exists and that this pool is important for the intracellular transfer of heme. Here we describe a study designed to characterise conjugates that form between heme and glutathione. In contrast to hydrated iron(II), heme reacts with glutathione, under aerobic conditions, to form the stable hematin–glutathione complex, which contains iron(III). Thus, glutathione is clearly not the cytosolic ligand for heme, indeed we demonstrate that the rate of heme degradation is enhanced in the presence of glutathione. We suggest that the concentration of heme in the cytosol is extremely low and that intracellular heme transfer occurs via intracellular membrane structures. Should any heme inadvertently escape into the cytosol, it would be rapidly conjugated to glutathione thereby protecting the cell from the toxic effects of heme.

Highlights

  • The labile iron pool, first proposed by Greenberg and Wintrope (1946) plays an essential role in supplying iron to iron–dependent enzymes and to mitochondria for heme and iron–sulfur cluster synthesis (Hider and Kong 2011)

  • Relating to this suggestion is the finding of Shviro and Shaklai (1987) that hematin binds GSH and that the 1:1 species is the dominant form of hematin (hematin is [ironIII(OH) protoporphyrin IX], hemin is [ironIII(Cl) protoporphyrin IX]) in the cytosol of erythrocytes

  • In contrast to iron(II)glutathione, in the presence of a porphyrin ring the favoured redox state is iron(III). This redox state was confirmed by mass spectrometry, where in the presence of glutathione, a new peak appeared at 923 m/z which corresponds to the [M ? H]? of GS/ hematin 1:1 conjugate (Fig. 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The labile iron pool, first proposed by Greenberg and Wintrope (1946) plays an essential role in supplying iron to iron–dependent enzymes and to mitochondria for heme and iron–sulfur cluster synthesis (Hider and Kong 2011). A labile heme cytosolic pool is reported to exist in mammalian cells (Shviro and Shaklai 1987; Sahini et al 1996) and as the axial iron coordination sites of heme are unoccupied, it is conceivable that GSH coordinates iron at one of these sites. Relating to this suggestion is the finding of Shviro and Shaklai (1987) that hematin binds GSH and that the 1:1 species is the dominant form of hematin (hematin is [ironIII(OH) protoporphyrin IX], hemin is [ironIII(Cl) protoporphyrin IX]) in the cytosol of erythrocytes. In view of these observations we decided to further characterise the interaction between GSH and heme

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call