Abstract

The incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are released from enteroendocrine cells in response to the presence of nutrients in the small intestines. These homones facilitate glucose regulation by stimulating insulin secretion in a glucose dependent manner while suppressing glucagon secretion. In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), an impaired insulin response to GLP-1 and GIP contributes to hyperglycemia. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors block the breakdown of GLP-1 and GIP to increase levels of the active hormones. In clinical trials, DPP-4 inhibitors have a modest impact on glycemic control. They are generally well-tolerated, weight neutral and do not increase the risk of hypoglycemia. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) are peptide derivatives of either exendin-4 or human GLP-1 designed to resist the activity of DPP-4 and therefore, have a prolonged half-life. In clinical trials, they have demonstrated superior efficacy to many oral antihyperglycemic drugs, improved weight loss and a low risk of hypoglycemia. However, GI adverse events, particularly nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea are seen. Both DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs have demonstrated safety in robust cardiovascular outcome trials, while several GLP-1 RAs have been shown to significantly reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in persons with T2DM with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several clinical trials have directly compared the efficacy and safety of DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs. These studies have generally demonstrated that the GLP-1 RA provided superior glycemic control and weight loss relative to the DPP-4 inhibitor. Both treatments were associated with a low and comparable incidence of hypoglycemia, but treatment with GLP-1 RAs were invariably associated with a higher incidence of GI adverse events. A few studies have evaluated switching patients from DPP-4 inhibitors to a GLP-1RA and, as expected, improved glycemic control and weight loss are seen following the switch. According to current clinical guidelines, GLP-1RA and DPP-4 inhibitors are both indicated for the glycemic management of patients with T2DM across the spectrum of disease. GLP-1RA may be preferred over DPP- 4 inhibitors for many patients because of the greater reductions in hemoglobin A1c and weight loss observed in the clinical trials. Among patients with preexisting CVD, GLP-1 receptor agonists with a proven cardiovascular benefit are indicated as add-on to metformin therapy.

Highlights

  • Background medicationHbA1cGLP1-RA vs. sitagliptin FPG PPG Weight ExenatideDeFronzo et al [42] Berg et al [43] 2 weeks [61] 8 weeks [86]5 μg BID × 1 week 10 μg BID × 1 week 10 μg BID

  • GLP-1RA and DPP-4 inhibitors are useful in the management of patients with T2DM over the spectrum of HbA1c levels, including drug naïve patients as well as those treated with other glucose lowering therapies

  • GLP1RA are preferred over DPP-4 inhibitors because of greater reductions in HbA1c and clinically significant weight loss observed in the clinical trials

Read more

Summary

Incretin Biology

Glucose homeostasis is dependent upon the complex interplay of multiple hormones including insulin, amylin, glucagon, and incretin hormones. Short-acting GLP-1RAs primarily lower the post-prandial glucose response by slowing gastric emptying in addition to enhancing insulin secretion [29, 31]. Long-acting GLP-1RAs lower the fasting blood glucose level by stimulating insulin secretion and reducing glucagon over an extended period of time They appear to have less prominent effects on post-prandial glucose excursions, perhaps because the effects on gastric motility are decreased due to tachyphylaxis [29, 31]. This study evaluated the effects of exenatide (5 and 10 mcg) vs sitagliptin (100 mg daily) on a number of clinical outcomes including postprandial glucose, gastric emptying, and secretion of insulin and glucagon. Berg et al [43] conducted an 8-week, randomized, activecomparator, crossover study comparing the effects of exenatide twice daily vs sitagliptin on glucose profiles in patients with T2DM.

OAD monotherapy
SWITCH TRIALS
CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES
Molecule type
Oral Semaglutide
Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer
Renal Insufficiency
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Findings
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call