Abstract

Gastrointestinal nematodes are a significant threat to the economic and environmental sustainability of keeping livestock, as adequate control becomes increasingly difficult due to the development of anthelmintic resistance in some systems and climate-driven changes to infection dynamics. To mitigate any negative impacts of climate on gastrointestinal nematode epidemiology and slow anthelmintic resistance development, there is a need to develop effective, targeted control strategies that minimise the unnecessary use of anthelmintic drugs and incorporate alternative strategies such as vaccination and evasive grazing. However, the impacts climate and gastrointestinal nematode epidemiology may have on the optimal control strategy are generally not considered, due to lack of available evidence to drive recommendations. Parasite transmission models can support control strategy evaluation to target field trials, thus reducing the resources and lead-time required to develop evidence-based control recommendations incorporating climate stochasticity. Gastrointestinal nematode population dynamics arising from natural infections have been difficult to replicate and model applications have often focussed on the free-living stages. A flexible framework is presented for the parasitic phase of gastrointestinal nematodes, GLOWORM-PARA, which complements an existing model of the free-living stages, GLOWORM-FL. Longitudinal parasitological data for two species that are of major economic importance in cattle, Ostertagia ostertagi and Cooperia oncophora, were obtained from seven cattle farms in Belgium for model validation. The framework replicated the observed seasonal dynamics of infection in cattle on these farms and overall, there was no evidence of systematic under- or over-prediction of faecal egg counts. However, the model under-predicted the faecal egg counts observed on one farm with very young calves, highlighting potential areas of uncertainty that may need further investigation if the model is to be applied to young livestock. The model could be used to drive further research into alternative parasite control strategies such as vaccine development and novel treatment approaches, and to understand gastrointestinal nematode epidemiology under changing climate and host management.

Highlights

  • Gastrointestinal (GI) nematodes are increasingly recognised as an important threat to the future sustainability of keeping livestock for food production and leisure

  • Livestock make a significant contribution to agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which may be exacerbated by GI nematode infections (Fox et al, 2018)

  • The model is developed and validated for trichostrongylid nematodes in the present study, it could be applied to other strongylid species with a broadly similar life cycle as all pre-adult stages are modelled as a single state variable and the pre-adult stage involved in arrested development is not specified

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gastrointestinal (GI) nematodes are increasingly recognised as an important threat to the future sustainability of keeping livestock for food production and leisure. Livestock make a significant contribution to agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which may be exacerbated by GI nematode infections (Fox et al, 2018). In 2013, methane emissions from cattle and sheep were responsible for 47% of agricultural GHG emissions in England, and approaching 90%. GI nematodes threaten food security and the economic sustainability of livestock farming as they cause significant production losses in ruminants (Nieuwhof and Bishop, 2005; Charlier et al, 2009). Reduction in weight gain (Mavrot et al, 2015). In cattle, GI nematodes cause significant reductions in weight gain and milk yield (Verschave et al, 2014b)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call