Abstract
In this chapter, the author intends to shed more light on Gregory of Nyssa's attempt at justifying Basil of Caesarea's views of έπίνoɩα and shows that in so doing he misrepresented Basil's (as well as Eunomius') views. ʾEπίνoɩα was placed in the context of the Trinitarian quarrels of the 4th century by Eunomius of Cyzicus'. Basil insisted on the exact significance of Plotinus' έπίνoɩα. Eunomius lists the Stoic ways of producing imaginary ideas as preserved in Sextus Empiricus. Keywords: έπίνoɩα; Eunomius; Gregory of Nyssa
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
