Glory and Agony: Isaac’s Sacrifice and National Narrative (review)

Abstract

Glory and Agony: Isaac's Sacrifice and National Narrative, by Yael S. Feldman. Stanford Studies in Jewish History and Culture. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010. 421 pp. $60.00. This book focuses on modern Hebrew retellings of the aqedah, the story of the binding and near-sacrifice of Isaac in Genesis 22. With background references to ancient, medieval, and modern philosophical attitudes toward this myth, Feldman traces its ubiquitous role in modern Hebrew literature over the last century. Her sheer number of examples, many of them central to contemporary Israeli culture, incontrovertibly establish that the aqedah has indeed functioned as one of the foundational cornerstones of modern Zionist and post-zionist discourse, a malleable structure that can be manipulated in many different, even opposed directions, by all those who have seized upon it since ancient times. Feldman's most important contribution to understanding aqedaic rhetoric is her identification of politicized intergenerational syndromes operating behind and grafted onto the familiar biblical symbols. She argues that what may just look like a literary reworking of the biblical story often masks a politicized Oedipus complex (or any other generational and gendered variations of this complex) projected onto the sparse parameters of Abraham and Isaac's relationship. To trace the main permutations of this modern psychopolitical conversation with Genesis 22, Feldman moves from a review of theories about the role and rhetoric of sacrifice in ancient times, to a detailed chronological overview of aqedaic discourse in the modern Hebrew imagination from 1904 until the present. In particular, she focuses on changing attitudes towards the idea of victimhood and (self )sacrifice from the phases of Second and Third Aliyah (1904-14 and 1919-23) to the War of Independence (1948), the Six Day War (1967), Yom Kippur War (1973), and finally the literature of protest surrounding the First War in Lebanon (1982). Wars in Israel are often discussed in terms of the generation that had been allegedly most traumatized by it. Intergenerational conflicts are thus easily projected unto the aqedah's pliable structure, so it can serve just as comfortably to blame Abraham or shake up Isaac, revisit the banished brother Ishmael or appeal to the absent mother Sarah. This malleability enables a spectrum of political attitudes ranging from naive pacifism to messianic nationalism, always linked to patricidal fantasies and filicidal counter accusations. Usually these are two sides of the same predicament-complicated here through obsessive reinterpretation of a malleable and suggestive biblical intertext that is constantly revisited in light of specific historical events such as the Crusades, the Holocaust, and different facets of the Arab-Israeli conflict. All these liter ary transmutations of the biblical story are ultimately driven by the question of whether there might have been a better alternative to the road taken. Of course Abraham's binding of his only son on Mount Moriah was traditionally interpreted as an act of total obedience to a God who thereby prohibited the child sacrifices and initiation rites practiced in the Canaanite region. …