Abstract

BackgroundAccurate estimation of the donor’s glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial for not only ensuring the medical appropriateness of the donor but also for the prediction of future allograft performance. The aim of this study was to compare the GFR estimation formulas and 24-hour urine creatinine clearance with diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) renal scan GFR.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was done at the Department of Nephro Urology Dialysis & Renal Transplantation, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Quaid e Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur, Pakistan from September 2018 to September 2021. A total of 92 potential healthy live-related kidney donors of both genders, aged 18 to 60 years having body mass index below 35 kg/m2 were included. GFR was calculated with modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD), Cockcroft-Gault (CG), chronic kidney disease epidemiology (CKD-EPI) equations as well as by 24-hour urine creatinine clearance. DTPA renal scan was done to record GFR findings. GFR was compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) among different methods.ResultsOut of a total of 92 individuals, 49 (53.3%) were male and 43 (46.7%) female. Mean age and BMI were noted to be 34.62±10.57 years and 24.40±2.71 kg/m2, respectively. Statistically significant differences existed between various methods of GFR estimation (p<0.001). Mean GFR as per DTPA renal scan findings was noted to be 97.32±9.39 ml/min/1.73 m2. Difference of 31.48±20.81, 27.37±21.1, 23.38±6.38, 15.52±37.52 was noted in estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) with CG formula, MDRD formula, EPI-CKD formula and 24-hour urine creatinine clearance respectively when compared with DTPA renal scan findings. The highest proportion of patients was seen with normal GFR with DTPA renal scan findings as 83 (90.2%) individuals while 24-hour urine creatinine clearance observed these to be 59 (64.1%), CG EPI-CKD formula 44 (47.8%), MDRD formula 39 (42.4%) and 40 (43.5%) with CG formula.ConclusionNone of the GFR estimation methods resulted in similar findings. With reference to the DTPA renal scan, 24-hour urine creatinine clearance was the closest GFR estimation followed by CKD-EPI and MDRD equations.

Highlights

  • Accurate estimation of the donor’s glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial for ensuring the medical appropriateness of the donor and for the prediction of future allograft performance

  • GFR was calculated with modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD), Cockcroft-Gault (CG), chronic kidney disease epidemiology (CKD-EPI) equations as well as by 24-hour urine creatinine clearance

  • Difference of 31.48±20.81, 27.37±21.1, 23.38±6.38, 15.52±37.52 was noted in estimated GFR with CG formula, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, EPI-CKD formula and 24-hour urine creatinine clearance respectively when compared with diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) renal scan findings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Accurate estimation of the donor’s glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial for ensuring the medical appropriateness of the donor and for the prediction of future allograft performance. Researchers have pointed out higher GFR of the donors to be independently linked with better allograft outcomes [1]. Multiple approaches exist regarding the assessment of kidney functions while the majority of settings adopt 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance (urine-CrCl) or creatinine-based GFR estimations like “Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)” or “Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation” [2,3]. The radionuclide diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) technetium 99m scan is convenient and. The aim of this study was to compare the GFR estimation formulas and 24-hour urine creatinine clearance with diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) renal scan GFR

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call