Abstract

Three species of giant barrel sponge are currently recognized in two distinct geographic regions, the tropical Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific. In this study, we used molecular techniques to study populations of giant barrel sponges across the globe and assessed whether the genetic structure of these populations agreed with current taxonomic consensus or, in contrast, whether there was evidence of cryptic species. Using molecular data, we assessed whether giant barrel sponges in each oceanic realm represented separate monophyletic lineages. Giant barrel sponges from 17 coral reef systems across the globe were sequenced for mitochondrial (partial CO1 and ATP6 genes) and nuclear (ATPsβ intron) DNA markers. In total, we obtained 395 combined sequences of the mitochondrial CO1 and ATP6 markers, which resulted in 17 different haplotypes. We compared a phylogenetic tree constructed from 285 alleles of the nuclear intron ATPsβ to the 17 mitochondrial haplotypes. Congruent patterns between mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees of giant barrel sponges provided evidence for the existence of multiple reproductively isolated species, particularly where they occurred in sympatry. The species complexes in the tropical Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific, however, do not form separate monophyletic lineages. This rules out the scenario that one species of giant barrel sponge developed into separate species complexes following geographic separation and instead suggests that multiple species of giant barrel sponges already existed prior to the physical separation of the Indo-Pacific and tropical Atlantic.

Highlights

  • There has been much controversy over the processes driving evolution and speciation in marine environments (e.g., Mayr 1942; Rocha and Bowen 2008)

  • We obtained a total of 395 combined sequences of partial mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 gene (CO1) and adenosine triphosphate synthase subunit 6 gene (ATP6) genes

  • The genetic differences between the nuclear clades are based on the variation of a single gene and the mitochondrial markers have low variation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been much controversy over the processes driving evolution and speciation in marine environments (e.g., Mayr 1942; Rocha and Bowen 2008). Coral Reefs (2017) 36:933–945 barriers are less obvious in seas and oceans than on land, and many marine organisms have long-range dispersal capabilities during early life stages Taken together, these factors were believed to lead to fewer opportunities for allopatric speciation compared to terrestrial ecosystems (Palumbi 1997; Rocha and Bowen 2008). Coral reefs are currently among the most vulnerable of ecosystems (Bridge et al 2013) due to the combined threat of climate change and anthropogenic stressors including pollution and overfishing (Hughes 1994; Pandolfi et al 2005) It is, important to study and quantify the diversity of these systems and understand the evolutionary processes that have led to this diversity

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call