Abstract
This paper considers the various ways in which unions respond to transnational restructuring in their longer-term planning and at different levels of action. To this extent, it avoids simply falling into a workplace-based view of mobilizing, or a national and state level view of union lobbying and mobilizing, but instead looks at how different (multi) levels of union action develop (or otherwise) a portfolio of sustainable longer term planning approaches. More concretely, it examines the way that unions activate their learning capacity at various levels in order to develop and use coordination and networking to respond to transnational restructuring. We approach restructuring not only from the point of view of unions’ external organizational relations (employers, members, community, etc.), but also their internal organizational requirements and relations that build a more proactive union response. To reframe the context in which union coordination capability is built up, transnational restructuring should be examined. We start from a conceptual distinction between “influencing” (external) and “communication” (internal) union strategies. Specifically, four different strategies, which take place at different levels of union action, are identified and presented in the paper. They reflect different dimensions of coordination as a feature of long term union learning and preparation in relation to restructuring: (1) lobbying and campaigning to influence the macro-level regulatory environment; (2) organizing and coordinating action in relation to influencing micro-level change; (3) developing informational and learning strategies about skills and training development to prepare individuals for negotiating change at the micro-level; and (4) developing communication and exchange of information with each other to create greater levels of awareness and focus in relation to restructuring at the macro-level. Conclusions identify that the structure and content of union coordination in the context of cross-border restructuring is a complex issue that cannot be reduced to simple historical binaries of bureaucracy-activist or employer facing versus membership facing. Our findings demonstrate that coordination works across various sets of dimensions (i.e. “influencing” and “communicating”), relations (internal and external) and levels (i.e. micro and macro). Therefore, it requires complex sets of organization and agendas.
Highlights
Transnational and cross-national company restructuring is one of the core challenges unions are facing in the context of globalization
The previous section presented diverse examples of trade union responses to restructuring from the Trade Unions Anticipating Change in Europe (TRACE) initiative developed by the European Trade Unions Confederation (ETUC) in order to foster, reflect on and learn from past and current change experiences
They demonstrate that engagement with restructuring by trade unions in Europe is nuanced. It works through different macro and micro levels of activity, different organizational imperatives and different levels of union action in relation to internal sharing and external influencing. These union responses lead to different types of networks and outcomes which are premised on a coherent learning environment
Summary
Transnational and cross-national company restructuring is one of the core challenges unions are facing in the context of globalization. Creating guidelines for EWC members aimed at enhancing their influence over the company-level management-driven decision making process implied enhancing the role of the EWCs by dealing with the challenges the sub-project identified in areas such as: harmonizing the different typology of EWC agreements (Art. 13 and Art. 6 of the European Directive on EWCs); developing common visions to avoid plant competition; increasing the number of meetings and resisting the replacement of “face-to-face” meetings with online meetings; avoiding the use of confidentiality rules as a means of not providing information to the European Works Councillors All these sub-projects faced challenges based on the fact that the networks of representatives were loosely organized at the start. In these cases the trade union actions were driven by educationalists that had the expertise but did not always have the access and authority locally that was needed to implant such innovations in the workplace
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have