Abstract
<p>The inorganic composition of aerosol impacts numerous chemical and physical processes and properties. However, many chemical transport models show large variability in both the concentration of the inorganic aerosols and their precursors (up to 3 orders of magnitude differences) and the inorganic aerosol composition. Different models predict very different properties (e.g., aerosol liquid water concentration and aerosol acidity) and outcomes (e.g., heterogeneous uptake of gases or aerosols’ direct and indirect impacts on climate). Here, we use airborne observations from campaigns conducted around the world to investigate how the inorganic fine aerosol (PM<sub>1</sub>) composition, and one of its key parameters, aerosol acidity, changes from polluted regions (Mexico City, Los Angeles, Northeastern US, and Seoul) to remote ocean basins (the Atmospheric Tomography campaigns 1 and 2) in order to provide constraints for the chemical transport models. I find that the empirical ammonium balance with major ions (ammonium balance = mol NH<sub>4</sub> / (2×mol SO<sub>4</sub> + mol NO<sub>3</sub>)) rapidly decreases from ~1 at the highest inorganic PM<sub>1</sub> concentration to 0 at the lowest inorganic PM<sub>1</sub>. The data indicate a robust trend for ammonium balance vs inorganic PM<sub>1</sub> at all altitude levels in the troposphere, suggesting that NH<sub>3</sub> emissions and subsequent neutralization of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> becomes negligible in the most remote (lowest inorganic PM<sub>1</sub>) regions. Further, a robust trend for PM<sub>1</sub> pH (calculated with E-AIM) vs inorganic PM<sub>1</sub> is observed at all levels for these campaigns, as well, decreasing from a pH of ~3 to a pH of ~ –1 from the highest to lowest inorganic PM<sub>1</sub>. The data overall implies very low NH<sub>3</sub> (and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) throughout most of the atmosphere, contrary to predictions of some models, implying different physical properties than predicted in models. We compare these trends of ammonium balance and pH vs inorganic PM<sub>1</sub> against 9 chemical transport models (CTMs), and we find that the CTMs show large variability for both the ammonium balance and pH vs inorganic PM<sub>­1</sub>, compared to observations. Generally, we find a high bias in the ammonium balance and pH, likely due to too much NH<sub>­3</sub> in model (possibly too high NH<sub>3</sub> emissions over oceans or too long lifetime) and inclusion of externally mixed seasalt into the submicron pH calculation. These results overall would imply different aerosol properties in the models than observed, impacting the chemistry, optical properties, and cloud properties.</p>
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.