Abstract

Previous studies have paid special attention to the relationship between local features (e.g., raised dots) and human roughness perception. However, the relationship between global features (e.g., curved surface) and haptic roughness perception is still unclear. In the present study, a series of roughness estimation experiments was performed to investigate how global features affect human roughness perception. In each experiment, participants were asked to estimate the roughness of a series of haptic stimuli that combined local features (raised dots) and global features (sinusoidal-like curves). Experiments were designed to reveal whether global features changed their haptic roughness estimation. Furthermore, the present study tested whether the exploration method (direct, indirect, and static) changed haptic roughness estimations and examined the contribution of global features to roughness estimations. The results showed that sinusoidal-like curved surfaces with small periods were perceived to be rougher than those with large periods, while the direction of finger movement and indirect exploration did not change this phenomenon. Furthermore, the influence of global features on roughness was modulated by local features, regardless of whether raised-dot surfaces or smooth surfaces were used. Taken together, these findings suggested that an object’s global features contribute to haptic roughness perceptions, while local features change the weight of the contribution that global features make to haptic roughness perceptions.

Highlights

  • IntroductionPeople can extract both geometric (e.g., curvature) and material properties (e.g., roughness and compliance) (Whitaker et al 2008) to form a representation of objects by touch

  • People can extract both geometric and material properties (Whitaker et al 2008) to form a representation of objects by touch

  • Experiment 1 demonstrated that roughness estimation was significantly affected by local features

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People can extract both geometric (e.g., curvature) and material properties (e.g., roughness and compliance) (Whitaker et al 2008) to form a representation of objects by touch. Many researchers have studied roughness perception on coarse surfaces by modulating local physical features, such as the groove width of the grating surface and dot spacing of raised-dot surfaces (Dépeault et al 2009; Drewing 2016; Lawrence et al 2007; Sutu et al.2013). These studies indicated that the spatial period of the surface plays a crucial role in roughness perception. Roughness perception is a complex, multidimensional sensation that is dependent

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call