Abstract

The article performs the current discussion of such categories as local and global in modern anthropology and suggests the option of using categories for the modern sociocultural reality of Dagestan society. The positions of leading researchers, deconstructing the concepts of “locality” and “community”, offering an alternative view of a traditional society rooted in a particular place, are demonstrated. Deterritorized societies in the face of significant social changes in the world (migration, including transnational and translocal, as well as the process of globalization) are becoming a new form of social interaction, where physical locality gives way to other categories linking people into relevant communities. In relation to the Dagestan realities, it is proposed to consider local deterritized societies through the prism of the conceptual metaphor “global village”. The factors contributing to the formation of such deterritorialized communities are shown. It is also shown the example of such a community - the village of Bezhta situated on the bordeland with the Republic of Georgia. A look at the complex of physical localities united by belonging to this mountain village (the village itself, resettlement villages on the plain of Dagestan, families located outside the republic in labor migration and living a translocal life, and also to a lesser extent the village of Chantliskuri in Georgia) as version of the "global village".

Highlights

  • На протяжении прошлого столетия антропология интересовалась, прежде всего, локальными культурами

  • The position of leading researchers, deconstructing the concepts of “locality” and “community”, offering an alternative view of a traditional society rooted in a particular place, are demonstrated in the paper

  • Regarding the Dagestan realities, we propose to consider local deterministic communities through the prism of the conceptual metaphor “global settlement”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

На протяжении прошлого столетия антропология интересовалась, прежде всего, локальными культурами. При этом транснационализм как термин имеет более ограниченное действие, чем глобализация: если глобальное может касаться всего мира, то транснационализм устанавливает связи между двумя или несколькими конкретными мирами, в первую очередь, связанными миграционными потоками [5, c.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call