Abstract

AbstractIncreasing temperature trends are expected to impact yields of major field crops by affecting various plant processes, such as phenology, growth, and evapotranspiration. However, future projections typically do not consider the effects of agronomic adaptation in farming practices. We use an ensemble of seven Global Gridded Crop Models to quantify the impacts and adaptation potential of field crops under increasing temperature up to 6 K, accounting for model uncertainty. We find that without adaptation, the dominant effect of temperature increase is to shorten the growing period and to reduce grain yields and production. We then test the potential of two agronomic measures to combat warming‐induced yield reduction: (i) use of cultivars with adjusted phenology to regain the reference growing period duration and (ii) conversion of rainfed systems to irrigated ones in order to alleviate the negative temperature effects that are mediated by crop evapotranspiration. We find that cultivar adaptation can fully compensate global production losses up to 2 K of temperature increase, with larger potentials in continental and temperate regions. Irrigation could also compensate production losses, but its potential is highest in arid regions, where irrigation expansion would be constrained by water scarcity. Moreover, we discuss that irrigation is not a true adaptation measure but rather an intensification strategy, as it equally increases production under any temperature level. In the tropics, even when introducing both adapted cultivars and irrigation, crop production declines already at moderate warming, making adaptation particularly challenging in these areas.

Highlights

  • Productivity of current cropping systems can be severely affected by changes in climatic and weather variables (Challinor et al, 2014; Rosenzweig et al, 2014)

  • If higher metabolic rates enhance primary productivity per unit of time, faster phenology leads to shorter crop growing period durations, which are often associated with shorter grain-filling periods and lower crop yields (Egli, 2011; Hatfield et al, 2011)

  • Using a large ensemble of Global Gridded Crop Model (GGCM) in a systematic warming experiment, we find that temperature increases lead to continuous reductions in global crop production without compensating adaptation measures, which is in line with previous findings (Challinor et al, 2014; Lobell et al, 2011; Liu et al, 2016; Rosenzweig et al, 2014; Zhao et al, 2017)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Productivity of current cropping systems can be severely affected by changes in climatic and weather variables (Challinor et al, 2014; Rosenzweig et al, 2014). If higher metabolic rates enhance primary productivity (biomass) per unit of time, faster phenology leads to shorter crop growing period durations (time from sowing to maturity), which are often associated with shorter grain-filling periods and lower crop yields (Egli, 2011; Hatfield et al, 2011). Crop yields are enhanced by high rates of evapotranspiration, due to the coupled exchange of water and CO2, increased by higher stomatal conductance. Most process-based crop models include temperature response functions on the major physiological rates, while only a few include heat-stress impact mechanisms and the canopy temperature regulation (Asseng et al, 2015; Atkin et al, 2005; Rezaei et al, 2015; Smith & Dukes, 2013; Wang et al, 2017; Webber et al, 2017). The combined effects of different stresses, such as temperature and water, which often occur simultaneously, are still poorly understood and pose a challenge for current global crop modeling (Chenu et al, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call