Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background/Introduction Choice in mapping technology may play a critical role in reducing fluoroscopy and procedure times during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, however this relationship is not well studied. Purpose To assess the impact of mapping technology on trends in fluoroscopy use and procedure times in AF ablation procedures. Methods Acute procedure data from 525 AF cases was prospectively collected from 68 centers in nine countries. Choice of technology and ablation strategy, including PVI and substrate modification, were left to physician discretion. Procedure data such as total procedure and fluoroscopy times from cases using a grid-style mapping catheter (HD Grid) were compared to those using a circular mapping catheter (CMC). Results Of the 525 cases, HD Grid was used in 230 (44%), and CMC was used in 295 (56%). HD Grid was routinely used for both de novo and redo procedures while CMC was used predominantly for de novo procedures (Table 1). Similar procedure times were noted in redo PAF and redo PersAF procedures, while significantly shorter procedure times were observed for the HD Grid group in both de novo PAF and PersAF (113.9±48.8 vs. 125.9±56.3 minutes, p=0.04; and 142.8±53.2 vs. 169.8±52.2 minutes, p=0.001). Overall fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter using HD Grid compared to a CMC (9.0±19.6 minutes vs. 19.8±16.4 minutes, p<0.001), including significantly shorter fluoroscopy times in de novo PAF, de novo PersAF, and redo PAF (Table 1). There were 155 cases completed without fluoroscopy use; zero fluoroscopy cases accounted for 50% (114/230) and 14% (41/295) of total cases completed with HD Grid and a CMC, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion(s) Use of HD Grid was observed in a significantly higher portion of zero fluoroscopy cases and resulted in significantly shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times in both de novo PAF and de novo PersAF and significantly shorter fluoroscopy times in redo PAF. These observations suggest that use of HD Grid may better enable faster and safer procedures in these specific AF types compared to CMCs, although further analysis in a larger, randomized cohort may be warranted.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call