Abstract

AbstractAimTo investigate the phylogeography of the aposematic wood tiger moth (Parasemia plantaginis) across its Holarctic distribution and to explore how its genetic structure relates to geographical differences in hindwing warning coloration of males and females. Males have polymorphic hindwing coloration, while female hindwing coloration varies continuously, but no geographical analyses of coloration or genetic structure exist.LocationThe Holarctic.MethodsWe sequenced a fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) from 587 specimens. We also examined more current population structure by genotyping 569 specimens at 10 nuclear microsatellite loci. Species distribution modelling for present conditions and the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) was performed to help understand genetic structure. Geographical patterns in hindwing warning coloration were described from 1428 specimens and compared to the genetic analyses.ResultsWe found only two instances of genetic divergence that coincided with distinct, yet imperfect, shifts in male hindwing coloration in the Caucasus region and Japan. A shift in female hindwing colour did not appear to be associated with genetic structure. A change from sexual monomorphism to sexual dimorphism was also observed. Mitogenetic (mtDNA) structure does not show the influence of glacial refugia during the LGM. Climate shifts following the LGM appear to have isolated the red Caucasus populations and other southerly populations. Populations at opposite ends of the moth's distribution showed high levels of differentiation in the microsatellite data analysis compared to the shallow mitogenetic structure, supporting a more recent divergence.Main conclusionsParasemia plantaginis populations appeared to have been historically well connected, but current populations are much more differentiated. This raises the possibility that incipient speciation may be occurring in portions of the species' distribution. Some changes in colour align to genetic differences, but others do not, which suggests a role for selective and non‐selection based influences on warning signal variation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call