Global ocean ventilation: a comparison between a general circulation model and data-constrained inverse models

Abstract

Ocean ventilation, or the transfer of tracers from the surface boundary layer into the ocean interior, is a critical process in the climate system. Here, we assess steady-state ventilation patterns and rates in three models of ocean transports: a 1° global configuration of the Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO), version 2 of the Ocean Circulation Inverse Model (OCIM), and the Total Matrix Intercomparison (TMI). We release artificial dyes in six surface regions of each model and compare equilibrium dye distributions as well as ideal age distributions. We find good qualitative agreement in large-scale dye distributions across the three models. However, the distributions indicate that TMI is more diffusive than OCIM, itself more diffusive than NEMO. NEMO simulates a sharp separation between bottom and intermediate water ventilation zones in the Southern Ocean, leading to a weaker influence of the latter zone on the abyssal ocean. A shallow bias of North Atlantic ventilation in NEMO contributes to a stronger presence of the North Atlantic dye in the mid-depth Southern Ocean and Pacific. This isopycnal communication between the North Atlantic surface and the mid-depth Pacific is very slow, however, and NEMO simulates a maximum age in the North Pacific about 900 years higher than the data-constrained models. Possible causes of this age bias are interrogated with NEMO sensitivity experiments. Implementation of an observation-based 3D map of isopycnal diffusivity augments the maximum age, due to weaker isopycnal diffusion at depths. We suggest that tracer upwelling in the subarctic Pacific is underestimated in NEMO and a key missing piece in the representation of global ocean ventilation in general circulation models.