Abstract

This study aims to approach the potential risks of the family businesses, on the basis of extensive literature and theoretical researches. This paper first provides a global overview that summarize the key literature of the family business risks, categorized according to their specificities. Subsequently, the risk mapping framework proposed is inspired by the internal control objectives (Note 1) suggested by the COSO 1 and 2 standards. This helped draw a global mapping of risks that therefore constitutes a first global risk mapping in literature, which are likely specific to this type of business. The result of our paper aims to enrich the theory and help managers to anticipate and manage family business risks.

Highlights

  • Research on the family business continues to expand and consolidate its relevance and legitimacy

  • We believe that developing a kind of mapping for risks of the family business would undoubtedly be an important step to have a global vision of the potential risks of this business

  • The objective of this study was to propose an analytical framework that helps decipher and anticipate managing risks of the family business dysfunctions presumably hampering the family business government. The categorization of these risks is of high importance because it helps identifying potential risks according to their sources

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research on the family business continues to expand and consolidate its relevance and legitimacy. The success of an investment in family businesses depends on certain criteria, mainly related to managers: the degree of their vigilance in the selection of projects, the clarification of their financial decisions, the planning in advance of the continuity of their businesses, and the intention of carrying out a given level of investment This last criterion, considered by (El mabrouki & al, 2012) (Note 9), as the most important arises from the conjunction of various elements including the family decision structures and the financial constraints felt or foreseeable by the leaders. The outside owners (usually minority), would support the same investment project risks as in non- family businesses because they benefit only from the appreciation of shareholder value (Schulze, Lubatkin and Dino, 2003) They would be indifferent to the level of risk inherent in any particular investment undertaken by the company because they can reduce it by dividing their portfolios. Hirigoyen has developed an approach relevant to the governance of the family business; "behavioral governance", which would allow us to clear the behavior of different actors in the operation of the family business and risks through these behaviors

Risks Related to Family Dynamics
Risks Related to the Presence or Failure of the Family Unit
The Risks of Conflicts
Conflicts Related to Family Control
Conflicts Agency
Risks of Conflicts Related to Shareholder Governance
Risks Linked to Behavioral Biases
The Bias of Nepotism
Risks Imputed to the Selection of Directors
The Control Family and Risk of Impaired Financial Information
Non-Financial Information
A Overall Risk Cartography Kinds of Family Business
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.