Global ionospheric signature of the tsunami triggered by the 2022 Hunga Tonga volcanic eruption

Abstract

<p>The Hunga Tonga volcanic eruption on Jan. 15, 2022 released a highly energetic atmospheric pressure wave that was observed all around the globe in different types of measurements (e.g., barometers and infrasound sensors, satellites images, ionospheric measurements, etc.). In addition, the eruption triggered a meteo-tsunami followed by a series of tsunami waves. Tide gauges across the Pacific Ocean, the Atlantic and the Indian oceans recorded significant sea-level changes related to the primary eruption.</p><p>We focus our presentation on the imprint of tsunami waves on the ionosphere. We make use of an extensive collection of Global Navigation Satellites Systems (GNSS) data recorded by multi-constellation GNSS receivers across the Pacific Ocean and beyond. The observation of tsunami-induced ionospheric signatures is made possible by the efficient coupling of tsunami waves with the surrounding atmosphere and the generation of internal gravity waves (IGWs). With the help of GNSS systems (Beidou, GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, QZSS), ionospheric disturbances can be monitored and observed by utilizing the Total Electron Content (TEC) derived from the delay that the ionosphere imposes in the electromagnetic signals transmitted by the GNSS satellites. We identify and characterize the ionospheric TEC signatures following the passage of the Tonga tsunami. We investigate the influence of known key ambient parameters such as the local geomagnetic field, the tsunami propagation direction, and the distance to the tsunami source on the amplitude of the observed signatures. Moreover, we correlate the detected tsunami-induced TEC signatures with sea level measurements to assess their tsunami origins. And we contrast the identified TEC signatures in the Pacific Ocean with their analogs induced by the tsunami triggered by the Mar. 4, 2021 8.1 Mw Kermadec Islands earthquake. Both events took place relatively in the same geographical region, with the former being less complex (no meteo-tsunami, shorter duration, and about one order of magnitude smaller in amplitude). Finally, we provide estimations of the tsunami amplitude at the ocean level in the areas crossed by GNSS radio signals, some of them not covered by open ocean sea-level sensors (DART buoys).</p>