Abstract

With rising demand for biomass, cropland expansion and intensification represent the main strategies to boost agricultural production, but are also major drivers of biodiversity decline. We investigate the consequences of attaining equal global production gains by 2030, either by cropland expansion or intensification, and analyse their impacts on agricultural markets and biodiversity. We find that both scenarios lead to lower crop prices across the world, even in regions where production decreases. Cropland expansion mostly affects biodiversity hotspots in Central and South America, while cropland intensification threatens biodiversity especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, India and China. Our results suggest that production gains will occur at the costs of biodiversity predominantly in developing tropical regions, while Europe and North America benefit from lower world market prices without putting their own biodiversity at risk. By identifying hotspots of potential future conflicts, we demonstrate where conservation prioritization is needed to balance agricultural production with conservation goals.

Highlights

  • With rising demand for biomass, cropland expansion and intensification represent the main strategies to boost agricultural production, but are major drivers of biodiversity decline

  • Due to the increase in supply in agricultural markets, crop prices fell in all regions, including those regions where domestic production decreased (e.g. EU, USA, Russia)

  • The EU turned from a net-exporter to a net-importer, while the netimporter Russia increased imports due to lower world market prices (Supplementary Fig. 15)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With rising demand for biomass, cropland expansion and intensification represent the main strategies to boost agricultural production, but are major drivers of biodiversity decline. We investigate the consequences of attaining equal global production gains by 2030, either by cropland expansion or intensification, and analyse their impacts on agricultural markets and biodiversity. We find that both scenarios lead to lower crop prices across the world, even in regions where production decreases. Agriculture is likely to remain the primary driver of global biodiversity loss, because both strategies to increase production, namely cropland expansion and intensification, pose major threats to many common as well as IUCN red-listed species[9,10]. (ii) account for spatial information on biophysical constraints as well as socio–economic drivers of agricultural production,

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call