Abstract

Leading up to the Convention on Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties 15, there is momentum around setting bold conservation targets. Yet, it remains unclear how much of Earth's land area remains without significant human influence and where this land is located. We compare four recent global maps of human influences across Earth's land, Anthromes, Global Human Modification, Human Footprint and Low Impact Areas, to answer these questions. Despite using various methodologies and data, these different spatial assessments independently estimate similar percentages of the Earth's terrestrial surface as having very low (20%–34%) and low (48%–56%) human influence. Three out of four spatial assessments agree on 46% of the non‐permanent ice‐ or snow‐covered land as having low human influence. However, much of the very low and low influence portions of the planet are comprised of cold (e.g., boreal forests, montane grasslands and tundra) or arid (e.g., deserts) landscapes. Only four biomes (boreal forests, deserts, temperate coniferous forests and tundra) have a majority of datasets agreeing that at least half of their area has very low human influence. More concerning, <1% of temperate grasslands, tropical coniferous forests and tropical dry forests have very low human influence across most datasets, and tropical grasslands, mangroves and montane grasslands also have <1% of land identified as very low influence across all datasets. These findings suggest that about half of Earth's terrestrial surface has relatively low human influence and offers opportunities for proactive conservation actions to retain the last intact ecosystems on the planet. However, though the relative abundance of ecosystem areas with low human influence varies widely by biome, conserving these last intact areas should be a high priority before they are completely lost.

Highlights

  • Ecosystems that have low human influence are vital contributors to human well-being (Díaz et al, 2018), including providing ecosystem services, buffering against climate change (Martin & Watson, 2016) and housing biodiversity (Di Marco, Ferrier, Harwood, Hoskins, & Watson, 2019)

  • Two biomes have a majority of datasets agreeing that at least half of their area has very low human influence (Figure 3a), while deserts and temperate coniferous forests have a majority of datasets agreeing that at least half of their area has low human influence (Figure 3b)

  • Despite varying input human stressor layers and methodologies employed by maps of Anthromes, Global Human Modification, Human Footprint and Low Impact Areas, the percentage of the terrestrial surface of the Earth that has very low and low human influence was found to be similar at global scales: 48%–56% low influence and 20%–34% very low influence (Table 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ecosystems that have low human influence are vital contributors to human well-being (Díaz et al, 2018), including providing ecosystem services (e.g., clean water and flood control, carbon storage and pollination; Watson, Venter, et al, 2018), buffering against climate change (Martin & Watson, 2016) and housing biodiversity (Di Marco, Ferrier, Harwood, Hoskins, & Watson, 2019) These so-called ‘wild’ or ‘wilderness’ areas are important as places of spiritual and mental renewal, exploration and wonder (Ewert, Overholt, Voight, & Wang, 2011) and serve many local communities by sustaining longterm cultural connections with these places (Garnett et al, 2018; Watson, Evans, et al, 2018). These losses persist even as countries have committed in the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) to dramatically decrease the rate of loss of natural habitats and to significantly reduce their degradation and fragmentation by 2020 (e.g., Aichi Target 5; CBD & UNEP, 2010)

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call