Abstract

Abstract. At present the lightning flash density is a key input parameter for assessing the risk of occurrence of a lightning strike in a particular region of interest. Since it is known that flashes tend to have more than one ground termination point on average, the use of ground strike point densities as opposed to flash densities is more appropriate. Lightning location systems (LLSs) do not directly provide ground strike point densities. However, ingesting their observations into an algorithm that groups strokes into respective ground strike points results in the sought-after density value. The aim of this study is to assess the ability of three distinct ground strike point algorithms to correctly determine the observed ground-truth strike points. The output of the algorithms is tested against a large set of ground-truth observations taken from different regions around the world, including Austria, Brazil, France, Spain, South Africa and the United States of America. These observations are linked to the observations made by a local LLS in order to retrieve the necessary parameters of each lightning discharge, which serve as input for the algorithms. Median values of the separation distance between the first stroke in the flash and subsequent ground strike points are found to vary between 1.3 and 2.75 km. It follows that all three of the algorithms perform well, with success rates of up to about 90 % to retrieve the correct type of the strokes in the flash, i.e., whether the stroke creates a new termination point or follows a pre-existing channel. The most important factor that influences the algorithms' performance is the accuracy by which the strokes are located by the LLS. Additionally, it is shown that the strokes' peak current plays an important role, whereby strokes with a larger absolute peak current have a higher probability of being correctly classified compared to the weaker strokes.

Highlights

  • Similar reasoning can explain the behavior of new ground contact points (NGCs), whereby NGCs are better predicted than pre-existing lightning channels (PECs) at lower distance thresholds

  • At a threshold of 10 km the outcome resembles the outcome of Algorithm 1 (A1), due to the merging of the ground strike point (GSP), if the distances are below 10 km

  • The reason why an enlarged distance threshold has practically no effect beyond 1 km is the explicit condition that the 50 % probability ellipse needs to overlap with one or more of the other error ellipses of strokes already assigned to the GSP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The deleterious effects of lightning discharges should not be underestimated In this respect, cloud-toground (CG) flashes play a particular part since they have an enormous impact on nature and society, both directly and indirectly. The economic effects of lightning damage on property are immense, whether concerning an individual household or a large-sized company, with total costs that can quickly spiral out of control. In this matter, electrical appliances are vulnerable to the electromagnetic fields induced by lightning. For a comprehensive overview of lightning hazards to human societies the interested reader is referred to Koshak et al (2015) and Yair (2018)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call