Abstract

The shape of the vertical electron density profile is a result of production, loss and transportation of plasma in the Earth’s ionosphere. Therefore, the equivalent slab thickness of the ionosphere that characterizes the width of vertical electron density profiles is an important parameter for a better understanding of ionospheric processes under regular as well as under perturbed conditions. The equivalent slab thickness is defined by the ratio of the vertical total electron content over the peak electron density and is therefore easy to compute by utilizing powerful data sources nowadays available thanks to ground and space based GNSS techniques. Here we use peak electron density data from three low earth orbiting (LEO) satellite missions, namely CHAMP, GRACE and FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC, as well as total electron content data obtained from numerous GNSS ground stations. For the first time, we present a global model of the equivalent slab thickness (Neustrelitz equivalent Slab Thickness Model – NSTM). The model approach is similar to a family of former model approaches successfully applied for total electron content (TEC), peak electron density NmF2 and corresponding height hmF2 at DLR. The model description focuses on an overall view of the behaviour of the equivalent slab thickness as a function of local time, season, geographic/geomagnetic location and solar activity on a global scale. In conclusion, the model agrees quite well with the overall observation data within a RMS range of 70 km. There is generally a good correlation with solar heat input that varies with local time, season and level of solar activity. However, under non-equilibrium conditions, plasma transport processes dominate the behaviour of the equivalent slab thickness. It is assumed that night-time plasmasphere–ionosphere coupling causes enhanced equivalent slab thickness values like the pre-sunrise enhancement. The overall fit provides consistent results with the mid-latitude bulge (MLB) of the equivalent slab thickness, described for the first time in this paper. Furthermore, the model recreates quite well ionospheric anomalies such as the Night-time Winter Anomaly (NWA) which is closely related to the Mid-latitude Summer Night-time Anomaly (MSNA) like the Weddell Sea Anomaly (WSA) and Okhotsk Sea Anomaly (OSA). Further model improvements can be achieved by using an extended model approach and considering the particular geomagnetic field structure.

Highlights

  • The equivalent slab thickness s describes the shape, more precisely the width of vertical electron density profiles of the ionosphere

  • The equivalent slab thickness is defined by the ratio of the vertical total electron content over the peak electron density and is easy to compute by utilizing powerful data sources nowadays available thanks to ground and space based global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) techniques

  • The model approach is similar to a family of former model approaches successfully applied for total electron content (TEC), peak electron density NmF2 and corresponding height hmF2 at DLR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The equivalent slab thickness s describes the shape, more precisely the width of vertical electron density profiles of the ionosphere. Due to the radially decreasing magnetic field weighting of Faraday rotation measurements at linearly polarized VHF signals from geostationary satellites, the derived TEC refers to a range up to about 2000 km (Jakowski & Kugland, 1982), whereas GNSS-based estimates of TEC refer to the full range up to satellite heights, fully including the plasmasphere This fact usually leads to mostly higher variable values of the equivalent slab thickness than observed in former beacon studies, in particular when the ionospheric ionisation is low. In a similar way, Muslim et al (2015) has developed a global model for the equivalent slab thickness that is based on simple sub-models for TEC and the critical frequency of the ionospheric F2 layer foF2 Such sub-model approaches smooth out special peculiarities of the equivalent slab thickness ignoring its high variability. One should be aware that the high natural variability of s generally limits the accuracy of model- based estimations of these quantities

Modelling database
Basic modelling approach
Modelling results
Validation of NSTM
The mid-latitude bulge of the equivalent slab thickness
Ionospheric anomalies
Findings
Summary and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call