Abstract

In the present study, the interplay and higher-order terms of environmental and spatial variables are considered to evaluate the relations of environment and space-species richness rankings at global scale. Three taxonomic groups composed of mammals, birds and amphibians were analyzed for the study. Thek-means clustering method was introduced for richness rankings detection and analysis from published digital maps; and simple regression analysis and AIC criteria were used for identifying mostimportant correlated explanatory variables.When comparing each single variable, I found that latitude was the most important one influencing global vertebrate richness rankings. When onlyconsidering environmental variables, I foundthat precipitation was the only predictor of vertebrate richness rankings. However, when the interaction and high-order terms of different independent variables were considered, it was found that the interaction between latitude and temperature could better explain the global bird richness ranking, while the second-power effectof latitude was the best predictor for amphibianand mammalian richness rankings, as evidenced by the AIC model selection and comparison among the regression models. In conclusion, the inclusion of high-order and interaction terms of environmental and spatial variables could offer more insights into the understanding of global species diversity patterns.

Highlights

  • Environment-species richness relationships have been broadly investigated [1,2,3,4]

  • The influence of space on species diversity was named as spatial autocorrelation [5], which stated that two locations have high similarity of species due to their close distance

  • I identified that two variables latitude and precipitation were the most correlated ones to all the three vertebrate richness rankings using linear regression analysis (Figure 1, Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Environment-species richness relationships have been broadly investigated [1,2,3,4]. The influence of space on species diversity was named as spatial autocorrelation [5], which stated that two locations have high similarity of species due to their close distance. The effects of interaction and high-order terms of environmental and spatial variables on influencing species richness seemed never investigated as far as I know. As for varying spatial scales, the coupling of different factors to affect species diversity and distribution should be quite usual. It might be valuable to consider the effects of interplay and higher-order terms of different environmental and spatial variables on species richness and provided a more general framework of environment/space-richness relationships

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.