Abstract

The Neolithic transition has led to marked increases in census population sizes across the world, as recorded by a rich archaeological record. However, previous attempts to detect such changes using genetic markers, especially mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), have mostly been unsuccessful. We use complete mtDNA genomes from over 1700 individuals, from the 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3, to explore changes in populations sizes in five populations for each of four major geographical regions, using a sophisticated coalescent-based Bayesian method (extended Bayesian skyline plots) and mutation rates calibrated with ancient DNA. Despite the power and sophistication of our analysis, we fail to find size changes that correspond to the Neolithic transitions of the study populations. However, we do detect a number of size changes, which tend to be replicated in most populations within each region. These changes are mostly much older than the Neolithic transition and could reflect either population expansion or changes in population structure. Given the amount of migration and population mixing that occurred after these ancient signals were generated, we caution that modern populations will often carry ghost signals of demographic events that occurred far away from their current location.

Highlights

  • The Neolithic transition was associated with major cultural and societal changes, and a number of archaeological lines of evidence point to a rapid increase in census population size following the advent of food production and the associated sedentarism

  • One South Asian population (BEB) failed to reach 200, so the results for this population should be treated with some caution

  • Because replicate subsets all yield similar profiles and the average profile is similar to others from the same geographical region, we believe that the broadly correct demographic history has been recovered

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Neolithic transition was associated with major cultural and societal changes, and a number of archaeological lines of evidence point to a rapid increase in census population size following the advent of food production and the associated sedentarism (reviewed in [1]). Past attempts to detect such size changes using genetic markers have generally failed to find any signal attributable to the Neolithic transition [2,3,4,5]. A major difficulty in interpreting these results is that genetic dating of events is a very challenging endeavour, as mutation rates (which provide the molecular clock used to convert genetic changes into calendar years) come with high levels of uncertainty [6]. Over the last couple of years, the availability of ancient DNA, coupled with sophisticated tip-based calibration methods that use the age of ancient samples to estimate the rate at which differences between sequences accumulate, has greatly improved the accuracy of mutation rates, especially for mtDNA [7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call