Abstract
This review-article deals with Werner Menski’s interesting argument (Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa 2006) for pluralistic and genuinely global comparative law. The content and general structure of this argument is described while it is also highlighted against the present literature on general comparative law. Also, the state of comparative law as a discipline is looked at side by side with the presentation of Menski’s argument and its key points. In the end, the author highlights some of the contributions and problems that Menski’s argument contains. In conclusion, the contribution of pluralistic and global comparative law is assessed specifically from the point of view of the European legal mind – what value, if any, does the argument for a pluralistic and diverse open comparative law epistemology have from the point of view of european centred and somewhat inside-looking scholarly debate.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
