Abstract

As part of the Paris climate agreement, countries have submitted (Intended) Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), which includes greenhouse gas reduction proposals beyond 2020. In this paper, we apply the IMAGE integrated assessment model to estimate the annual abatement costs of achieving the NDC reduction targets, and the additional costs if countries would take targets in line with keeping global warming well below 2°C and “pursue efforts” towards 1.5°C. We have found that abatement costs are very sensitive to socio-economic assumptions: under Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 3 (SSP3) assumptions of slow economic growth, rapidly growing population, and high inequality, global abatement costs of achieving the unconditional NDCs are estimated at USD135 billion by 2030, which is more than twice the level as under the more sustainable socio-economic assumptions of SSP1. Furthermore, we project that the additional costs of full implementation of the conditional NDCs are substantial, ranging from 40 to 55 billion USD, depending on socio-economic assumptions. Of the ten major emitting economies, Brazil, Canada and the USA are projected to have the highest cots as share of GDP to implement the conditional NDCs, while the costs for Japan, China, Russia, and India are relatively low. Allowing for emission trading could decrease global costs substantially, by more than half for the unconditional NDCs and almost by half for the conditional NDCs. Finally, the required effort in terms of abatement costs of achieving 2030 emission levels consistent with 2°C pathways would be at least three times higher than the costs of achieving the conditional NDCs – even though reductions need to be twice as much. For 1.5°C, the costs would be 5–6 times as high.

Highlights

  • In December 2015, Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) adopted the Paris Agreement to address climate change (UNFCCC, 2015a)

  • Many Parties formulated and submitted Intended Nationally Determined Contributions or INDCs (UNFCCC, 2015b) that outline the post-2020 climate action plans they intend to take under the Paris Agreement

  • We present projections of direct abatement costs resulting from measures implemented to achieve the NDC reduction targets, both for the world as a whole and for major emitting countries or large multiple-country regions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hof et al / Environmental Science & Policy 71 (2017) 30–40 achieve the enhanced reduction targets in line with meeting the below 2 C and 1.5 C target, i.e. keeping the global warming to below 2 C by 2100 with a 66% or higher probability and to below 1.5 C with a 50% or higher probability Such projections are highly relevant, as mitigation costs are an indication of the level of ambition in combating climate change, and as such can be used for the global stocktake of the NDCs that is to be held every 5 years as agreed in the Paris Agreement. Our analysis focuses on the following research questions: (i) What would be the abatement costs and financial flows for reaching the 2030 NDC reduction targets? What would be the impact of emissions trading? (Section 3); (ii) What would be the (additional) abatement costs if countries would take enhanced reduction targets in line with meeting the below 2 C or 1.5 C target, assuming cost-optimal reductions over regions? (Section 4)

Harmonized SSP baselines
NDC mitigation targets
Abatement costs
NDC abatement costs
Findings
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call