Abstract

Field studies suggest a linkage between high physical erosion rates and rates of chemical denudation. Mechanical erosion by temperate glaciers is commonly an order of magnitude higher than in mountainous fluvial catchments, leading to an expectation that chemical weathering fluxes should also be high from glacierized basins. Yet solute fluxes from glaciers are not found to be higher than non-glacierized catchments. Application of a model of silicate weathering from glaciers based on mineral surface area production and mineralogy shows that solute fluxes are consistent with the low temperatures, dilute water chemistry, and high mineral surface area production in these environments. Low temperatures reduce silicate-weathering rates; this effect explains the difference between silica fluxes from glaciers and from non-glacierized basins. As in laboratory flow-through reactors, glacial solute flux should depend on surface area production and mineral weathering rate constants. The surface area production is significant: a typical glacial erosion rate and grain-size distribution produces on the order of 104 km2 of mineral surface area per square kilometer per year. This new surface area is highly reactive because mineral weathering rates decline with surface age. Application of the “reactor” model yields results largely consistent with measured solute fluxes for the example of Bench Glacier, Alaska. The model underpredicts potassium fluxes, probably due to accelerated initial dissolution of biotite strained by abrasion. The success of the model in predicting other silicate weathering fluxes reflects the far-from-equilibrium conditions in glacial runoff, such that mineral weathering rate constants are not limited by saturation state. In a small data set from glacial catchments, both annual silica fluxes and mean concentrations increase with water discharge. This suggests that mineral surface area increases with water discharge from glaciers, an effect plausibly linked to erosion rates. Those glaciers for which both erosion rate and silica flux data are available support the idea that production of new reactive mineral surface area by glacial erosion drives silicate weathering fluxes.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.