Abstract

Syntactic priming during language production is pervasive and well-studied. Hearing, reading, speaking or writing a sentence with a given structure increases the probability of subsequently producing the same structure, regardless of whether the prime and target share lexical content. In contrast, syntactic priming during comprehension has proven more elusive, fueling claims that comprehension is less dependent on general syntactic representations and more dependent on lexical knowledge. In three experiments we explored syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Participants acted out double-object (DO) or prepositional-object (PO) dative sentences while their eye movements were recorded. Prime sentences used different verbs and nouns than the target sentences. In target sentences, the onset of the direct-object noun was consistent with both an animate recipient and an inanimate theme, creating a temporary ambiguity in the argument structure of the verb (DO e.g., Show the horse the book; PO e.g., Show the horn to the dog). We measured the difference in looks to the potential recipient and the potential theme during the ambiguous interval. In all experiments, participants who heard DO primes showed a greater preference for the recipient over the theme than those who heard PO primes, demonstrating across-verb priming during online language comprehension. These results accord with priming found in production studies, indicating a role for abstract structural information during comprehension as well as production.

Highlights

  • Syntactic priming during language production is pervasive and well-studied

  • In addition to picture-description, priming has been demonstrated during written sentence completion, spoken sentence completion, and dialogue with a confederate (Branigan, Pickering & Cleland, 2000; Branigan, Pickering, Stewart & McLean, 2000; Pickering & Branigan, 1998). These studies show that prior exposure to structural information, either through comprehension or production, influences adults’ subsequent production. These effects persist even when the verb in the prime sentence is different from that in the target sentence, indicating that abstract syntactic representations are used during language production

  • Using an act-out comprehension task, we investigated whether prior DO or PO dative sentences influenced the comprehension of subsequent dative sentences with different verbs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Syntactic priming during language production is pervasive and well-studied. Hearing, reading, speaking or writing a sentence with a given structure increases the probability of subsequently producing the same structure, regardless of whether the prime and target share lexical content. In addition to picture-description, priming has been demonstrated during written sentence completion, spoken sentence completion, and dialogue with a confederate (Branigan, Pickering & Cleland, 2000; Branigan, Pickering, Stewart & McLean, 2000; Pickering & Branigan, 1998) These studies show that prior exposure to structural information, either through comprehension or production, influences adults’ subsequent production. These effects persist even when the verb in the prime sentence is different from that in the target sentence, indicating that abstract syntactic representations are used during language production.. These studies did not explore online processing, so it is unclear whether the priming effects relate to initial analysis or later reanalysis (Branigan, Pickering, Liversedge, Stewart & Urbach, 1995)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call