Abstract

As societies move toward a deeper engagement with humanitarianism and egalitarianism, education systems have increasingly embodied a commitment to principles of inclusion. The field of gifted and talented education (GATE) has reflected these changes in recent discussions around equity, diversity, and inclusive practices. This article aims to re-examine the practices of gifted education and rethink the possibility of generating an egalitarianism-based, GATE-derived inclusive education discourse that can serve as a parallel to the predominant humanitarianism-drive inclusive education movement. Within a discourse of self-actualization, we propose framing “gifted” as a process-based, rather than person-based, construct that applies to all students as they are enabled to transact their gifts and talents through engaging in a “gift-ed” process through honing self-knowledge and learning gifted behaviors. We advocate the use of person-first language, (i.e., students with advanced learning needs/advanced and special learning needs (ALN/ASLN)) that will encourage specific interventions.

Highlights

  • ObjectivesThis article aims to re-examine the practices of gifted education and rethink the possibility of generating an egalitarianism-based, GATEderived inclusive education discourse that can serve as a parallel to the predominant humanitarianism-drive inclusive education movement

  • This article aims to re-examine the practices of gifted education, including gifted labeling, and rethink the possibility of generating a gifted and talented education (GATE)-derived inclusive education discourse that can serve as a parallel discourse to the predominant humanitarianism-drive inclusive education movement

  • The idea of giftedness as something that can be developed in all learners can empower students to take control over their own learning

Read more

Summary

Objectives

This article aims to re-examine the practices of gifted education and rethink the possibility of generating an egalitarianism-based, GATEderived inclusive education discourse that can serve as a parallel to the predominant humanitarianism-drive inclusive education movement. This article aims to re-examine the practices of gifted education, including gifted labeling, and rethink the possibility of generating a GATE-derived inclusive education discourse that can serve as a parallel discourse to the predominant humanitarianism-drive inclusive education movement

Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call