Abstract

Plant hormones have become appropriate candidates for driving functional plant mycorrhization programs, including the processes that regulate the formation of arbuscules in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis. Here, we examine the role played by ABA/GA interactions regulating the formation of AM in tomato. We report differences in ABA and GA metabolism between control and mycorrhizal roots. Active synthesis and catabolism of ABA occur in AM roots. GAs level increases as a consequence of a symbiosis-induced mechanism that requires functional arbuscules which in turn is dependent on a functional ABA pathway. A negative interaction in their metabolism has been demonstrated. ABA attenuates GA-biosynthetic and increases GA-catabolic gene expression leading to a reduction in bioactive GAs. Vice versa, GA activated ABA catabolism mainly in mycorrhizal roots. The negative impact of GA3 on arbuscule abundance in wild-type plants is partially offset by treatment with ABA and the application of a GA biosynthesis inhibitor rescued the arbuscule abundance in the ABA-deficient sitiens mutant. These findings, coupled with the evidence that ABA application leads to reduce bioactive GA1, support the hypothesis that ABA could act modifying bioactive GA level to regulate AM. Taken together, our results suggest that these hormones perform essential functions and antagonize each other by oppositely regulating AM formation in tomato roots.

Highlights

  • Several studies have shown that abscisic acid (ABA) and GAs, whose optimal balance is essential for normal plant development, interact antagonistically in numerous plant developmental processes (Weiss and Ori, 2007; Rodríguez-Gacio et al, 2009)

  • Our results show that differences in ABA metabolism between control and mycorrhizal roots exist (Table 1)

  • The main ABA metabolism pathway appears to go through 8 - hydroxylation and conjugation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several studies have shown that ABA and GAs, whose optimal balance is essential for normal plant development, interact antagonistically in numerous plant developmental processes (Weiss and Ori, 2007; Rodríguez-Gacio et al, 2009). ABA is a positive regulator of dormancy induction and its maintenance. While it is a negative regulator of germination, GAs release. ABA and Gibberellins Regulates AM Symbiosis dormancy, promote germination and counteract the impact of ABA (Kucera et al, 2005). ABA and GAs antagonistically regulate their own metabolic processes. Low ABA level promotes GA biosynthesis (Seo et al, 2006) and vice versa (Oh et al, 2007). A recent study points out that ABA-INSENSITIVE 4 (ABI4) is a central factor in GA/ABA homeostasis and suggests that ABA and GA antagonize each other by oppositely acting on ABI4 transcript and protein levels (Shu et al, 2016)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call