Abstract

Asian honeybees use an impressive array of strategies to protect nests from hornet attacks, although little is understood about how antipredator signals coordinate defences. We compared vibroacoustic signalling and defensive responses of Apis cerana colonies that were attacked by either the group-hunting giant hornet Vespa soror or the smaller, solitary-hunting hornet Vespa velutina. Apis cerana colonies produced hisses, brief stop signals and longer pipes under hornet-free conditions. However, hornet-attack stimuli—and V. soror workers in particular—triggered dramatic increases in signalling rates within colonies. Soundscapes were cacophonous when V. soror predators were directly outside of nests, in part because of frenetic production of antipredator pipes, a previously undescribed signal. Antipredator pipes share acoustic traits with alarm shrieks, fear screams and panic calls of primates, birds and meerkats. Workers making antipredator pipes exposed their Nasonov gland, suggesting the potential for multimodal alarm signalling that warns nestmates about the presence of dangerous hornets and assembles workers for defence. Concurrent observations of nest entrances showed an increase in worker activities that support effective defences against giant hornets. Apis cerana workers flexibly employ a diverse alarm repertoire in response to attack attributes, mirroring features of sophisticated alarm calling in socially complex vertebrates.

Highlights

  • One of the most intriguing features of animal sociality is the evolution of shared signals that convey information and coordinate activity among group members [1,2,3,4,5]

  • Predation is a major selective pressure for animals that live in conspicuous social groups, and the rich antipredator signalling that it drives can reveal the intricacies of social communication [6,7]

  • Antipredator signals may be multimodal, which can refine their influence on recipients, aid communication in noisy environments and help group members respond appropriately when attacks come from multiple types of predators [9,19,20,21,22]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the most intriguing features of animal sociality is the evolution of shared signals that convey information and coordinate activity among group members [1,2,3,4,5]. Signals produced in response to predators may encode predator type, level of urgency or both [12,13,14,15] These signals may be discrete or graded, meaning they may have distinct features that discriminate them from other signal types or they may vary on a continuum with intermediate forms [9,16,17,18]. Antipredator signals may be multimodal, which can refine their influence on recipients, aid communication in noisy environments and help group members respond appropriately when attacks come from multiple types of predators [9,19,20,21,22]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.