“Ghost[s] in the House!”: Black Subjectivity and Cultural Memory in Howard Sackler’s <i>The Great White Hope</i>

Abstract

After The Great White Hope (1967) won the Pulitzer Prize for Drama in 1969, its author, Howard Sackler, told the New York Times that the play was not “about blacks and whites” and was instead “a metaphor of struggle between man and the outside world.” Figuring racial identity as a dramatic device, he argued that what made the play compelling was “not [its] topicality, but the combination of circumstances, the destiny of a man pitted against society” (Shepard). Though Sackler drew the play’s protagonist Jack Jefferson from events in the life of the first African American heavyweight champion Jack Johnson, whose reign from 1908 to 1915 sparked racially motivated violence throughout the US, he consistently argued for the universality of the play’s characters and themes. Despite his claim, Jefferson’s racial identity and the nation’s racial turmoil framed theater critics’ discussion of the play in both the mainstream and African American press at its 1967 debut at the Arena Stage in Washington, DC, and its subsequent 1968 Broadway opening at the Alvin Theatre. In turning to the African American Freedom Struggle of the 1960s with its social and political unrest, as well as the spectral presences of both Johnson and Muhammad Ali in their evaluations of the play, theater critics resist Sackler’s positioning of universality and topicality as mutually exclusive and reject racial identity as simply a dramatic device. This critical impasse between Sackler’s stated authorial intent and theater critics, who do not deny the play’s universality, but instead emphasize its topical comment on 1960s racial politics, creates space to consider The Great White Hope from three vantages: first, as an exploration of the tensions between the play’s representation of Jefferson and the post-soul aesthetic that challenges Sackler’s claim of race-neutral universality; second, as a critique of Progressive Era racial hierarchies and racial uplift ideology—the “racial common sense” of the Progressive Era and its implications for African American subjectivity; and third, as a means of recovering how the play is situated in cultural memory by examining theater