Abstract

目的:比較評估兩種不同模式-(1)以劑量-體積基礎優化條件為主的強度調控放射治療計劃(DV-based IMRT plan,簡稱DV-plan),(2)以DV-based優化條件為主,並以廣義等效均勻劑量(generalized equilibrium uniform dose, gEUD-based)優化條件為輔的強度調控放射治療計劃(DV-gEUD-based IMRT plan, 簡稱DV-gEUD-plan)對於雙邊乳癌病患治療之間的差異。材料與方法:本研究採用6位疾病分期為T2~T4的雙邊乳癌病患,使用Pinnacle^3 (version 8.0 m, Philips, Fitchburg, WI)治療計劃系統分別規劃DV-based與DV-gEUD計劃進行比較,並在配備有120葉多葉式準直儀的Varian 21 EX Linac (Varian Medical Systems Milpitas, CA)機器執行治療。計劃靶體積(planning target volume, PTV)的劑量處方為50.4 Gy,進行28次的分次治療。利用劑量指標評估量化計劃結果,包括PTV的順形指標(conformity index, CI)、勻稱指標(homogeneity Index, HI)和腫瘤控制率(tumor control probability TCP);危及器官(包括心、肺臓)的V(下標 20Gy)與V(下標 30Gy)體積、平均劑量與正常組織副作用發生率(normal tissue complication probability, NTCP)。同時,評估治療計劃執行的正確率。結果:DV-與DV-gEUD-plan都能符合PTV包覆率的要求,PTV順形指標和勻稱指標在兩計劃表現相當,而DV-gEUD-plan 具有減少危及器官劑量的優勢:心臟、肺臟的平均劑量與肺臟V(下標 20Gy)、心臟V(下標 30Gy)在DV-gEUD-plan都比DV-plan低(p值小於0.05)。另外兩種計劃Gamma (T(下標 3mm. 3%))分析結果都有95.5%以上的通過率。結論:DV-gEUD-Plan結合DV-與gEUD-based的目標函數,可以創建更好的計劃結果。這種混合的方法,可以減少DV-plan試誤的次數,同時保留gEUD-plan所提供的最佳劑量分佈。

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.