Abstract

Consistent with a dynamic constructivist approach to culture, we propose the negotiation context activates a different set of needs for U.S. and Japanese negotiators. While both U.S. and Japanese negotiators have needs to be logical and to uphold social norms, we propose that the effectiveness of influence strategies will be explained more by a need for logic in U.S. negotiations and a need to uphold social norms in Japanese negotiations. We test our hypotheses with a sample of 15 U.S. and 15 Japanese dyads that negotiated a conflict simulation. Results indicate that the interaction between a negotiator's use of influence and the partner's underlying needs in predicting how much value negotiators claim is distinct in the U.S. and the Japanese culture. Findings offer extensions to existing theory on culture and negotiation and implications for managers in cross-cultural negotiation and conflict settings.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.