Getting the Big Picture in Perspectivist Optics

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessGetting the Big Picture in Perspectivist OpticsA. Mark SmithA. Mark Smith Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 72, Number 4Dec., 1981 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/352843 Views: 20Total views on this site Citations: 21Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1981 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Angela Axworthy Jacques Peletier, (Jun 2022): 75–97.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95817-6_3Yael Kedar Optics, Latin, (Jul 2020): 1357–1366.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_557A. Mark Smith Seeing the Light: A Response to “Chasing the Light”, Isis 110, no.22 (May 2019): 283–289.https://doi.org/10.1086/703514Danilo Capecchi New Forms of Natural Philosophy and Mixed Mathematics, (Jul 2017): 147–259.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58310-5_3Assim Boukhayma Introduction, (Nov 2017): 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68774-2_1Yael Kedar Optics, Latin, (Jan 2018): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_557-1Caroline O. Fowler From a Geometry of Vision to a Geometry of Light in Early-Modern Perspective, Architecture_MPS (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.amps.2017v11i1.001Tawrin Baker Kepler's optics: Ocular anatomy, the visual faculty, and the continuity-discontinuity debate, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 59 (Oct 2016): 115–120.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.03.002Delphine Bellis The Perception of Spatial Depth in Kepler’s and Descartes’ Optics: A Study of an Epistemological Reversal, (Sep 2016): 125–152.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41075-3_5Michael Jacovides Locke on Perception, (Sep 2015): 176–192.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118328705.ch9 Bibliography, (Aug 2015): 265–292.https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666550904.265Gary Hatfield Natural Geometry in Descartes and Kepler, Res Philosophica 92, no.11 (Jan 2015): 117–148.https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.2015.92.1.6Sven Dupré Kepler’s optics without hypotheses, Synthese 185, no.33 (Sep 2011): 501–525.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9977-6Edward Mackinnon From Categories to Quantitative Concepts, (Oct 2011): 25–68.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2369-6_2Ofer Gal, Raz Chen-Morris Empiricism Without the Senses: How the Instrument Replaced the Eye, (Jan 2010): 121–147.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3686-5_7Dallas G. Denery II Seeing and Being Seen in the Later Medieval World, 43 (Jul 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511496462P. J. Boner Soul-Searching with Kepler: An Analysis of Anima in His Astrology, Journal for the History of Astronomy 36, no.11 (Feb 2005): 7–20.https://doi.org/10.1177/002182860503600102 Stephen Perkinson Engin and Artifice: Describing Creative Agency at the Court of France, ca. 1400, Gesta 41, no.11 (Oct 2015): 51–67.https://doi.org/10.2307/767205A. Mark Smith Ptolemy, Alhazen, and Kepler and the Problem of Optical Images, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 8, no.11 (Oct 2008): 9–44.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0957423900002423Antoni Malet Keplerian illusions: Geòmetrical pictures vs optical images in Kepler's visual theory, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21, no.11 (Mar 1990): 1–40.https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(90)90013-XPeter Galison Descartes's Comparisons: From the Invisible to the Visible, Isis 75, no.22 (Oct 2015): 311–326.https://doi.org/10.1086/353484