Abstract
ABSTRACT Over the past 20 years, intellectual humility research has blossomed. Ballantyne’s (2021) target article argues that intellectual humility research is stymied by disagreements over assessment, terminology, and how to accommodate certain findings with others. In this commentary, I make a case that these struggles are a typical part of a broader research cycle. I use the General Aggression Model as an example of when researchers applied intellectual humility to develop an overarching theory of aggression and how doing so supercharged aggression research. I conclude by encouraging intellectual humility researchers to come together and formulate a general theory of intellectual humility.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
