Getting ahead: exploitative competition by an invasive lizard

Abstract

Biological invasions are a contemporary global threat because invasive species can have substantial negative economic and ecological impacts. Invasive species can outcompete native species through two main mechanisms: interference competition (direct, negative interactions like aggression) and/or exploitative competition (indirect, negative interactions resulting from species using the same, limited resources like food). The invasive Italian wall lizard (Podarcis siculus) was introduced into Lisbon, Portugal, 20 years ago, and is believed to be locally displacing the native green Iberian wall lizard (Podarcis virescens). We experimentally tested for competition between these two lizard species by establishing heterospecific (one pair of each species) and conspecific (two pairs of the same species; control) treatments in enclosures containing a high- and a low-quality refuge. Lizards were fed from food dishes every other day. We tested if species showed interference (aggressive behaviour, stealing food and shelter exclusion) or exploitative competition (tolerance between species but differences in food consumption efficiency). We found evidence for exploitative competition: the invasive species arrived first at food stations, consumed more food and gained more weight than the native species. We suggest that exploitative competition may, in part, explain the observed displacement of P. virescens from contact areas with the invasive P. siculus. Deciphering the competitive mechanisms between invasive and native species is vital for understanding the invasion process. To become successful invaders, alien species must often outcompete native species they encounter in a new location. But how can an alien species outcompete a resident with a long evolutionary history in an environment in which the resident is expected to be better adapted? We studied an invasive and native congeneric pair of sympatric lizards to understand how they interact and potentially compete in a controlled environment. The invasive Italian wall lizard and a native congener were very tolerant of each other; however, the invasive species was first to arrive at food, ate more and grew faster, suggesting exploitative competition. This contrasts with previous studies in other introduced locations where the Italian wall lizard was more aggressive towards native lizards, suggestive of interference competition. Our results help explain why the Italian wall lizard is so successful and suggests it may compete in different ways, possibly in response to local environmental conditions and which species it may be competing with, but with the same outcome: the displacement of native species.