Abstract
BackgroundHigh morphological diversity can occur in closely related animals when selection favors morphologies that are subject to intrinsic biological constraints. A good example is subterranean rodents of the genus Thomomys, one of the most taxonomically and morphologically diverse mammalian genera. Highly procumbent, tooth-digging rodent skull shapes are often geometric consequences of increased body size. Indeed, larger-bodied Thomomys species tend to inhabit harder soils. We used geometric morphometric analyses to investigate the interplay between soil hardness (the main extrinsic selection pressure on fossorial mammals) and allometry (i.e. shape change due to size change; generally considered the main intrinsic factor) on crania and humeri in this fast-evolving mammalian clade.ResultsLarger Thomomys species/subspecies tend to have more procumbent cranial shapes with some exceptions, including a small-bodied species inhabiting hard soils. Counter to earlier suggestions, cranial shape within Thomomys does not follow a genus-wide allometric pattern as even regional subpopulations differ in allometric slopes. In contrast, humeral shape varies less with body size and with soil hardness. Soft-soil taxa have larger humeral muscle attachment sites but retain an orthodont (non-procumbent) cranial morphology. In intermediate soils, two pairs of sister taxa diverge through differential modifications on either the humerus or the cranium. In the hardest soils, both humeral and cranial morphology are derived through large muscle attachment sites and a high degree of procumbency.ConclusionsOur results show that conflict between morphological function and intrinsic allometric patterning can quickly and differentially alter the rodent skeleton, especially the skull. In addition, we found a new case of convergent evolution of incisor procumbency among large-, medium-, and small-sized species inhabiting hard soils. This occurs through different combinations of allometric and non-allometric changes, contributing to shape diversity within the genus. The strong influence of allometry on cranial shape appears to confirm suggestions that developmental change underlies mammalian cranial shape divergences, but this requires confirmation from ontogenetic studies. Our findings illustrate how a variety of intrinsic processes, resulting in species-level convergence, could sustain a genus-level range across a variety of extrinsic environments. This might represent a mechanism for observations of genus-level niche conservation despite species extinctions in mammals.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0782-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
High morphological diversity can occur in closely related animals when selection favors morphologies that are subject to intrinsic biological constraints
Samples We examined 452 crania and 73 humeri from adult female specimens of genus Thomomys pocket gophers housed in the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (MVZ) at the University of California, Berkeley in the United States
The distribution of taxa along ventral cranial PC1 is similar to their distribution along the lateral cranial PC1 with larger body size corresponding to deeper, more robust skulls (Fig. 3d, f) and smaller body size corresponding to more gracile skulls (Fig. 3d, f)
Summary
High morphological diversity can occur in closely related animals when selection favors morphologies that are subject to intrinsic biological constraints. We used geometric morphometric analyses to investigate the interplay between soil hardness (the main extrinsic selection pressure on fossorial mammals) and allometry (i.e. shape change due to size change; generally considered the main intrinsic factor) on crania and humeri in this fast-evolving mammalian clade. Animal populations modify their existing anatomy in response to selection. Because of limitations imposed by the available morphospace, phylogenetic constraints, and evolutionary time [5], these intrinsic processes can reduce the range of adaptations to new selection pressures. The impact of conflicts between morphological constraints and functional selection can be observed across phylogenetic scales, ranging from at the population level (e.g. [6, 7]) and as large as the three major mammalian subclasses (e.g. [8, 9])
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Cranial Shape
Soil Hardness
Allometric Pattern
Cranial Morphology
Muscle Attachment Sites
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Zoomorphology
Jun 1, 2019
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Mar 26, 2021
Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery
Jan 1, 2006
Acta Chiropterologica
Jun 1, 2016
Journal of Zoology
Feb 9, 2010
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Jan 8, 2019
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Oct 16, 2018
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Jul 1, 2017
Copeia
Aug 2, 1999
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Feb 22, 2010
Royal Society Open Science
Sep 1, 2021
Jan 1, 2007
Journal of Zoology
Oct 1, 2000
Journal of Zoology
Oct 1, 2000
BMC Evolutionary Biology
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Dec 29, 2020
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Dec 11, 2020
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Dec 9, 2020
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Dec 9, 2020
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Dec 9, 2020
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Dec 1, 2020
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Nov 30, 2020
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Nov 26, 2020
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Nov 23, 2020
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Nov 23, 2020