Abstract
Aims/IntroductionTo investigate the relationship between pregnancy‐associated plasma protein A (PAPP‐A) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and to determine whether PAPP‐A has improved value for predicting GDM in a Chinese population.Materials and MethodsClinical data for 599 GDM patients and 986 unaffected pregnant women undergoing both antenatal examinations and delivery were retrospectively analyzed. First‐trimester serum PAPP‐A levels were compared between the groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to explore the risk factors for GDM, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the value of PAPP‐A for predicting GDM.Results GDM‐affected and unaffected pregnant women were significantly different in terms of age (P < 0.001), BMI (P < 0.001), family history of diabetes (P = 0.002), α‐thalassemia trait (P < 0.01), parity (P < 0.001), conception methods (P < 0.001), gestational weeks at the time of labor (P < 0.001) and corrected PAPP‐A multiples of the median values (P < 0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that PAPP‐A levels were negatively related to the subsequent development of GDM (odds ratio 0.798, 95% confidence interval 0.647–0.984). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for maternal factors was 0.684 (95% CI: 0.657–0.711), and did not significantly differ from that for the combination of maternal factors and serum PAPP‐A levels, which was 0.686 (95% CI: 0.660–0.713; χ2 = 0.625, P = 0.429).ConclusionsSerum PAPP‐A was an independent factor for the development of GDM in pregnant Chinese women. Serum‐PAPP‐A does not have improved value with respect to predicting GDM when combined with other maternal factors.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.