Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of Germanys participation in UN, EU and NATO peacekeeping operations in Africa. The relevance of the research topic is due to conflicting opinions about the need to preserve and prolong most operations in the region. In this regard, the opinions of experts with optimistic and pessimistic views on this problem are considered, and the stages of the evolution of peacekeeping activities are highlighted. The purpose of the study is to prove the validity of the assumption of the critical theory of the use of peacemaking by countries as a tool for realizing their foreign policy aspirations. Based on the analysis of German efforts to increase its military contingent in UN peacekeeping operations and maintain positions (despite the presence of oppositional representatives of the Parliament) in EU and NATO operations, it is proposed to identify the cause-and-effect relationships of such behavior. To achieve this goal, we used the method of historicism, which helped to identify the problems of the past that Germany is trying to get rid of by participating in the operations of international organizations, as well as the method of comparative analysis, which regulates the comparison of Germanys efforts in missions with its foreign policy tasks. The analysis of the documents of the international organizations under consideration, as well as legislation and foreign policy doctrines of Germany, allows us to assess not only the legality of the country's operations outside its borders, but also to identify foreign policy priorities in order to obtain reliable results when comparing them. In conclusion, we present the following conclusions: the evolution of Germanys efforts in the UN, EU and NATO missions in Africa. The results of the research reflect the postulates of critical theory in the process of studying German peacekeeping activities in Africa.
Highlights
The purpose of the study is to prove the validity of the assumption of the critical theory of the use of peacemaking by countries as a tool for realizing their foreign policy aspirations
Based on the analysis of German efforts to increase its military contingent in UN peacekeeping operations and maintain positions in EU and NATO operations, it is proposed to identify the cause-and-effect relationships of such behavior
We used the method of historicism, which helped to identify the problems of the past that Germany is trying to get rid of by participating in the operations of international organizations, as well as the method of comparative analysis, which regulates the comparison of Germany’s efforts in missions with its foreign policy tasks
Summary
Статья посвящена изучению особенностей участия Германии в миротворческих операциях ООН, ЕС и НАТО в Африке. На примере анализа германских усилий по наращиванию своего военного контингента в рамках миротворческих операций ООН и сохранению позиций (вопреки наличию оппозиционно настроенных представителей Парламента) в операциях ЕС и НАТО предлагается выявить причинно-следственные связи такого поведения государства. Для достижения поставленной цели использованы метод историзма, который помог выявить проблемы прошлого, от которых Германия посредством участия в операциях международных организаций пытается избавиться, а также метод сравнительного анализа, регулирующий сопоставление усилий Германии в миссиях с ее внешнеполитическими задачами. Анализ документов рассматриваемых международных организаций, а также законодательных актов и внешнеполитических доктрин Германии позволяет оценить не только законность проведения страной операций за пределами своих границ, но и выявить приоритеты внешней политики для получения достоверных результатов при сравнении. В заключении представлены выводы об эволюции усилий Германии в миссиях ООН, ЕС и НАТО в Африке и моделях поведения страны в операциях международных организаций.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.