Abstract

Footprints are powerful indicators for evaluating the impacts of a country’s bioeconomy on environmental goods, both domestic and abroad. We apply a hybrid approach combining a multi-regional input-output model and land use modelling to compute the agricultural land footprint (aLF). Furthermore, we added information on land-use change to the analysis and allocated land conversion to specific commodities. Using Germany as a case study, we show that the aLF abroad is 2.5 to 3 times larger compared to impacts within the country. When allocating land conversion of natural and semi-natural land-cover types in 2005 and 2010 to import increases by Germany, conversion rates were found to be 2.5 times higher than for the global average. Import increases to Germany slowed down in 2015 and 2020, reducing land conversion attributed to the German bioeconomy as well. Our results indicate that looking at a static import pattern is not sufficient to draw a realistic picture of the land footprint of a country. For a more detailed assessment that also considers temporal dynamics and impacts of biomass use and trade, our newly developed set of indicators also captures changes of import patterns over time. The case study shows that our enhanced land footprint provides clear and meaningful information for policymakers and other stakeholders.

Highlights

  • Biomass is the central basis for human life

  • For monitoring the bioeconomy’s environmental footprint on domestic land use and abroad, there is the need for ready-to-use indicators that provide clear and meaningful information for policymakers and other stakeholders

  • We present the agricultural land footprint as an approach that combines global trade data and modelling of historic land-use, and it allocates biomass use and trade to observed land use and land conversion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biomass is the central basis for human life. It is used as food and feed and for material and energy uses. The steadily increasing global consumption of biomass has negative impacts on numerous environmental goods and ecosystem functions [1,2,3]. The concept of bioeconomy (BE) encompasses agriculture, forestry, and fisheries. It aims to avoid negative impacts of biomass uses and to promote positive ones [4,5,6], especially in the context of the overarching sustainable development goals (SDGs) [7,8]. To ensure that the sustainability claim of the BE does not remain an empty phrase, it is important to monitor and document its impacts in an adequate way [9,10]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.