German Word Stress in Optimality Theory

Abstract

Stress has always been a recurrent theme in phonology, even more so since Liberman’s dissertation (1975), in which the foundations of metrical theory were established. Liberman’s view of stress as a phonetic means of grouping linguistic elements has found considerable agreement in the phonological community. However, the nature of both the groupings and the elements to be grouped is still a matter of debate. In this paper I make the very conventional assumption that syllables are grouped into feet. Studies on stress systems fall into two classes. First, extensive typological studies, like those of Halle and Vergnaud (1987), Hayes (1980, 1995), and Idsardi (1992), for instance, compare the stress systems of a large number of languages and propose parameters of stress assignment and/or feet inventories. The second class of studies examine in detail the stress pattern of a single language or a language family from a theoretical point of view. The present paper falls into the second class. Close studies of individual language stress systems are important since they are a way of testing the validity of metrical theories. Though some languages have been extensively studied and can be claimed to be fairly well understood, this is far from being true of all languages. This paper shows that Optimality Theory (OT) is able to elegantly capture the intricacies of German stress without too many special stipulations. OT is a theory of grammar recently developed by Prince and Smolensky (1993) and McCarthy and Prince (1993a, b, 1994, 1995), who have applied it to phonological facts from different languages. So far, the theory has been