Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze human resource management in organizations operating in Brazil, in connection to generational issues and commitment. A multi-case study was carried out in two companies: Dow and Promon. Questionnaires were applied to 331 Dow employees (out of a total population of 2465) and 298 Promon employees (out of a total population of 1800). As for generational management, results demonstrated that such management is not carried out in a formal manner, but rather takes place only informally through other programs that achieve this duty indirectly. At Promon, hierarchical position causes such a variation, whereas in Dow it is due to time at the company. Such differences are explained by the particular characteristics of the organizations. Such management takes place only informally, through other programs that achieve this duty indirectly. From this result, and from the display of the importance of productive coexistence among generations, the need for implementing formal policies that fulfill such a need can be observed. Generally speaking, although there is evidence of age-based generational differences in Brazil, there is evidence that human resource policies and practices, though not geared towards generational management, have the potential to make people commit in a similar manner, irrespective of their age. Keywords Generations; Human resource management; Commitment.

Highlights

  • New, more horizontal organizational structures in more compact spaces are forcing people of all age groups to coexist in the workplace (Lepak & Shaw, 2008; Meister & Willyerd, 2010; Lyons & Kuron, 2014)

  • The aim of this study is to analyze human resource management in organizations that operate in Brazil, in connection to generational issues and commitment

  • In the analysis of employee perceptions at these organizations, we considered the temporal delimitation of Silva et al (2015) for age-based identity, adapted to the Brazilian reality, in which those born between 1946 and 1964 belong to the Baby Boomer generation, 1965-1985 as generation X, and from 1985 onwards as generation Y

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More horizontal organizational structures in more compact spaces are forcing people of all age groups to coexist in the workplace (Lepak & Shaw, 2008; Meister & Willyerd, 2010; Lyons & Kuron, 2014) In this sense, researchers warn us about the fact that greater proximity has the potential to create conflicts between different generational groups in organizations, because of their different values, ambitions, expectations, and preconceptions (Meister & Willyerd, 2010; Mcguire, Todnem & Hutchings, 2007; Zemke, Raines & Filipczak, 2000). Employees who work in environments that match their preferences are more likely to display commitment and behaviors that are better suited to the organization’s expectations

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call