Abstract

This study assesses the geotechnical properties of lateritic soil stabilized with the ashes ofoil palm fronds. These properties are then compared with those of the same soil stabilized withcement to determine how well the ashes perform since cement is considered to be the beststabilizer. Laboratory tests such as specific gravity, moisture content, Atterberg limits, particle sizedistribution, compaction, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and California bearing ratio(CBR) tests were first carried out to determine the basic properties of the lateritic soil (without thestabilizers). Based on the results of these tests, the soil was classified according to AASHTO soilclassification system as an A-7-5 soil which is a poor soil. Hence, the need for stabilization.Thereafter, strength tests such as California bearing ratio (CBR), unconfined compressive strength(UCS) and compaction tests were performed on the soil to which the ashes and cement wereadded in percentages of 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 by weight of the lateritic soil. The compaction testshowed that the highest maximum dry densities (MDD) were recorded in the case of the oil palmfrond ash (OPFA) and cement at 4% (MDD = 2.02kg/m3) and 6% (MDD = 2.40kg/m3) respectively.The highest CBR values obtained were 32.6% and 87.32% at 4% OPFA content and 6% cementcontent respectively.The unconfined compressive strengths (UCS) of the soil were highest at 4%OPFA content (234.86kN/m2) and 6% cement content (588.32kN/m2). The chemical testsperformed on the OPFA and the cement showed that the highest oxide component were SiO2(33.67%) and CaO (60.83%) respectively.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call