Abstract

Soil and geosynthetic components are used together in lining and cover systems for waste-containment facilities to protect the environment by acting as a hydraulic barrier. Since the performance of the barrier depends on the components remaining intact, accurate predictions of tensile loads in the components are important. Lining- and cover-system components must be designed to resist tensile loads anticipated. Four methods for determining tensile loads are examined in this paper. Two common design methods, called the limit equilibrium method (LEM) and the limit method (LM), that consider only force equilibrium to predict tensile loads are compared with two proposed methods that consider both force equilibrium and displacement compatibility. An example multiple-layered cover system is used to compare predictions from the four methods. The comparison indicates that displacement compatibility is an important consideration and can influence predictions significantly for tensile load. Estimates of tensile load in the geosynthetics using the state of practice may be too great (as for the LM) or too small (as for the LEM), compared with more rigorous displacement compatibility methods.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.